Jump to content

Talk:Meg & Dia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleMeg & Dia was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 10, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 6, 2011Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA review comments

[edit]

Even though I nominated this article, I would like to make some comments.

  • Picture was recently deleted as "fair-use image which can be replaced with a free one"; hoping to find a free one soon. Will not be easy as I seem to be the main contributer to the article now, and Meg and Dia don't seem to come to England much. Also, since they aren't the biggest band in the world, free pictures on websites such as Flickr are not common.
  • References in my opinion are very well used. For a small band such as this, references are scarce, and I feel they are well used here, so please take this into account!
    — jacĸrм (talk) 21:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold

[edit]

Indeed it's close. A few notes.

  • The biography section should be split into subsections sorted by significant milestones (see Powderfinger etc.) or by album.
  • The last few sentences in it are one sentence paragraphs - merge 'em
  • The members could potentially get their own articles...(not a GA requirement though)
  • "and Cursive. [11] During live" - should be no space before ref

 Dihydrogen Monoxide 11:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated...

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
  • This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.[?]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 9 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Dihydrogen Monoxide 11:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed?

[edit]

The following has been done by Thepeoplesuck and I:

  • Biography section arranged chronologically and by important milestones.
  • Last sentences merged.
  • References fixed (references after grammar, no spaces).
  • Members for individual members would be stubs, if that. Simply not enough information available on individual members of the band, only the band themselves.

-- Jack 23:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009 Updates and thoughts

[edit]
  • I just did a minor overhaul of the 2008-2009 section (assimilated the Give It A Name 2008 section) and added a here, here and here section, which still needs more info.
  • I also think the Personnel section is unnecessary, but have not removed it.
  • I would like to point out a common grammatical issue. When referring to the band (Meg & Dia or simply the band), the possessive form should be it's, not their because the band is a singular entity. When referring to the two individuals Meg and Dia (or Dia and Meg), use their. I encourage all future editors of the page to follow these standards.
  • Also, I believe the album should be titled here, here and here and not Here, Here, and Here (the song title capitalizes the first H only and has just one comma). I've removed the erroneous serial comma from the title of the Wikipedia page for the album.

Thepeoplesuck (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll sweep through and fix the singular for "the band", but the capitalization of the album and song should at least have the first letter capitalized per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(music)#Capitalization. So I'll change it to Here, here and here AngusWOOF (talk) 16:41, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible state

[edit]

I just edited this article for the first time in a while and it was in a horrible state. The infobox was partially removed, no picture (no reason for removal), the info on them was partially removed so it made no sense, and nobody even noticed! Yet it remains a good article. -- Jack?! 00:08, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Our Home Is Gone

[edit]

The article Our Home Is Gone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No mention of notability, no references "only about 1000 albums were sold". Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Meg & Dia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Meg & Dia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Meg & Dia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Superfluous references

[edit]

I edited this article awhile back, trying to pare it down and remove some of the "fluff"-- I was mostly reverted. I believe the subject here is notable, but I am less certain that the article warrants the blogspot references, press releases, facebook entries, itunes store, and shopify.com stuff (which strikes me as VERY promotional). To the extent that other editors agree that the article should have most of these kinds of "references" removed, please let me know by leaving a message below. I will be watching this page. Thanks. A loose noose (talk) 06:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Meg_%26_Dia&oldid=1205414258"