Jump to content

Talk:Mediterranean basin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Mediterranean Basin)


Untitled

[edit]

This needs to be much better integrated with Mediterranean Sea. Or vice versa. --Joy [shallot] 15:33, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Olive trees?

[edit]

A basin is an hydrographic/orographic entity, not based on the flora. What is the point of including most of Portugal (Atlantic shore), but not Egypt? I also think that, perhaps in California are some olive trees. Is that part also of the Mediterranean Basin?.

This article needs a deep clean. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.116.23.136 (talk) 10:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New data source

[edit]

Moved from article:

An open-source database (named WDB-Paleo) of marine sediment cores from the Mediterranean Basin has been published as a tool for past climatic and environmental studies. The database contains four main categories of data: (1) details from oceanographic cruises and cores, (2) paleoclimatic proxies derived from 200 scientific publications, (3) results of quantitative analyses of planktonic and benthonic organisms, and (4) quantitative data of δ18O, 14C and tephra layers.[1]

References

  1. ^ Alberico, Ines; Giliberti, I.; Insinga, D.D.; Petrosino, P.; Vallefuoco, M.; Lirer, F.; Bonomo, S.; Cascella, A.; Anzalone, E.; et al. (2017-06-20). "Marine sediment cores database for the Mediterranean Basin: a tool for past climatic and environmental studies". Open Geosciences. 9 (1): 221–239. doi:10.1515/geo-2017-0019. ISSN 2391-5447. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first9= (help)

List of countries on the Mediterranean Basin

[edit]

Israel has been excluded from the list of countries on the Mediterranean Basin. Can you re-instate? 2A02:C7C:52B4:8B00:A591:98F4:3366:F08A (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such list that exists. 2001:8003:9100:2C01:F5EF:C921:7B13:49DD (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 November 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mediterranean Basin → Mediterranean basin – According to the MOS:CAPS guideline "only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia". When we look at an ngram however - [1] - which analyses book usage of this term, we see that far from it being consistently capitalized, in fact a large majority of sources render it in sentence case. I had initially moved this as uncontroversial in August, but it's now been reverted by User:Vic Park with the rationale of "Proper grammar" so I'm now requesting it formally. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 09:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Although the Mediterranean Basin defines a geographical land area and not a drainage basin, the lowercasers may get this one solely because of n-grams, but would like to point out that 'Basin' is cased in n-grams in some other areas (i.e. Congo Basin, the Nile Basin, and the Great Basin - where there is over 2/3rds agreement on the proper names) and lowercased in some (Amazon basin, which isn't as familiar of a name). Why not just leave major geographical and geological names exist on Wikipedia as proper names? The recent major move of the Earth's tectonic plates to lowercase (i.e. North American Plate) is a prime example of Wikipedia openly calling an accepted proper name not a proper name, and that one will be up for review after further discussion with the closer. Anyway, even Mediterranean Basin has been perfectly acceptable as a proper name on Wikipedia since 2005, regardless of rules and regs, although it does fall under the percentage threshold. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Tarim Basin is also uppercased per n-gram data. Just pointing out that Wikipedia obviously views many basins as proper names. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    What do you mean by "Wikipedia ... views many...."? Just that many titles are currently capitalizing "Basin"? Or that the ones that are consistently capitalized in sources are consistent with Wikipedia guidelines? Or something else? Dicklyon (talk) 05:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    What size are North American number plates? I wonder whether those people who proposed the move actually know the differences between a generic term and a specific term? N. Mortimer (talk) 03:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not as big as North American dinner plates, generally, not as big as the North American tectonic plate, by a wide margin. I wonder why you ask. Dicklyon (talk) 05:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why not just leave major geographical and geological names exist on Wikipedia as proper names? First off, that presumes incorrectly that they're all already capitalized as [if] proper names on WP already, which isn't the case. Ssecond, and more toward the question asked, its because we have 2 decades of people making conflicting arguments about what "proper name" means "really" and what "is" or "should be" a proper name, and there is no way to resolve that constant-fighting problem other than by imposing a sourcing-based standard, which is what Wikipedia did long ago. And you know all this already, so why ask the same question again?  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Geographical features are proper names. For proper names, we need to capitalise the first letter of every word. Here are some examples: Tibetan Plateau, Arabian Peninsula, Deccan Plateau, Malay Archipelago, Kalahari Desert, Mexican Plateau, and Australian Shield etc.
As for the book usage of this term, it can be used as a reference, but that doesn't mean every word they have written is grammatically perfect. Some of the authors or editors aren't native English speakers themselves. If you compare 200 books, 60% of them might use Mediterranean basin, but that doesn't mean they are grammatically correct.
By the way, I noticed that most articles in Wikipedia use "Mediterranean Basin" instead of "Mediterranean basin".
Link: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?search=Mediterranean+basin&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1 Vic Park (talk) 13:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have notified the interested WikiProjects. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support – Guidelines suggest lowercase for this. There's no basis in fact, in guidelines, or in sources, for Vic's assertion that "Geographical features are proper names". Many are not. Dicklyon (talk) 00:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, if they are not proper names, what are they? They are definitely not common nouns.
    According to the Australian Government Style Manual (the standard for Australian Government writing and editing), the full names of all topographic and geographic terms (mountains, rivers, valleys, bays, islands and other features) always take initial capitals.
    Link: https://www.stylemanual.gov.au/grammar-punctuation-and-conventions/names-and-terms/topographic-terms Vic Park (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The "other features" there might include everything with "region", "basin", "area", etc., appended, in Australia gov style; or might not. Britannica doesn't see it that way. And we have our own manual of style, and basis certainly is a common noun. Have you looked at MOS:CAPS? Dicklyon (talk) 15:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Dicklyon, your Britannica link includes "Also known as: Mediterranean Basin", uppercased. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes it does, but they also show how they use it in a sentence, which is what matters here: "...the oil produced in the Mediterranean basin is consumed there..." Dicklyon (talk) 18:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Then that comes out to a draw, and also shows (if you can get past the ads) that Britannica's editors often need some pointers. Randy Kryn (talk) 05:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't regard Britannica as particularly authoritative on style, but they do show on this one that they don't think caps are necessary. Hardly a "draw". Dicklyon (talk) 17:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Then a 'wash'. In your link Britannica has both uppercased and lowercased the word, showing an editorial oversight lack. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not really a wash. Wikipedia weights lowercase more heavily than uppercase. Unless the sources consistently use uppercase, Wikipedia uses lowercase. So a mixture in a source would indicate lowercase for Wikipedia. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    To me it indicates bad editing on the part of Britannica and nothing more. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Per WP:NCCAPS, MOS:CAPS and ngram evidence where capitalisation is the minority and therefore clearly evidences that capitalisation is not necessary. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    But a Mediterranean-style wash basin and the Mediterranean geographical region aren't the same thing, we are comparing apples with oranges here. N. Mortimer (talk) 03:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    My, I am specifically very fond of the Pink Enamel Mediterranean Basin I use when cooking. But without capital letters, the French in must be thoroughly confused about which bassin méditerranéen to wash in. Look for the ridiculous in everything, and you will find it. Cinderella157 (talk) 09:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support: Reminds me of the recent Talk:Eurasian Plate#Requested move 6 October 2024 (74 articles) – Lowercase "Plate"? Result: Lowercase. Capitalization does not seem necessary here, and Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The plates will likely be the subject of a move review, so that's not set in stone (neither are the separate plates). Randy Kryn (talk) 03:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Well, what is a Mediterranean-style wash basin has to do with this geographical region? Jokes aside, I think you'll get what I meant. Nope, definitely not going to support the generic term. It should be the "Mediterranean Basin" and nothing else. N. Mortimer (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If Mediterranean basin in sources sometimes referred to wash basins, or something other than the topic of this article, we'd want to know that, as it might mean the topic of the article is more often capitalized than it appears. But nobody has found or pointed out any such other meanings for the lowercase version, so it appears from the stats that authors don't generally see a need to capitalize here. Per our guideline criteria in MOS:CAPS, then we should use lowercase. So why are you saying capped and nothing else? Dicklyon (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    One of the issues here is that the national guidance of the form of English I am most familiar with consistently uses capitalisation in geographical proper names but this does not apply universally...e.g. Indian English "district". If geographic features are shared, as in this case by multiple English subcultures (e.g. Gibraltarian and Maltese English) then wikipedia can default to sentence case even if International English overwhelming uses capitalisation. I have no definite view as I have a PoV from the English I was taught at an impressionable age. ChaseKiwi (talk) 23:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There's no evidence of this being treated consistently at a national-dialect-of-English level in any dialect, including the one you chose to highlight, so what's the point of injecting a bogus WP:ENGVAR argument? And Europe isn't largely English-speaking in the first place (lacks a strong national tie) so ENGVAR could not apply regardless.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, since this does not come close to passing the only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Wikipedia. test (MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS). N-grams are not the most reliable approach to this. It is better to analyze Google Scholar results. For this [2], using the top 10 pages of search hits, and ignoring use in title-case titles, headings, and captions, the results are: uppercase 29 sources, lowercase 58 sources, plus 8 sources using both spellings in different places, and 2 sources indeterminate for lack of full-text access. Absolutely, positively nowhere near consistent capitalization in the source material.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mediterranean_basin&oldid=1259539031"