Talk:Mediatonic

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mediatonic article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Mediatonic" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 21 August 2013 by reviewer LukeSurl (talk · contribs).

230 employees source

Would be appreciated if someone could source the claim on this page that Mediatonic has 230 employees as of 2020.73.83.117.50 (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is sourced in the body to VentureBeat:

Now Mediatonic has grown into four studios with 230 people making titles such as ...

Regards, IceWelder [✉] 05:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

I've just come across this article for the first time. On the face of it, it looks very much like an article written by a person or persons with a close connection with the company. It reads like a sort-of company CV, which is why I've added the newsrelease template. The vast majority of the content comes from IP editors (with an amazingly large first edit in August 2013). I can't really be certain, but it's probably all been written by people at Mediatonic or someone representing them. A clumsy IP address search brings up London and Brighton for server locations, but that doesn't really prove much. Still, the article is harmless enough as it's not advert-like. The company seems notable enough for Wikipedia, so I'm not proposing deletion. Nevertheless, I'm always worried about articles like this. Presumably it's just basic marketing to make sure there's a sensible sort of Wikipedia article. However maybe I'm completely wrong and there's just a very keen Mediatonic fan out there (who doesn't have a Wikipedia account!) Seaweed (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the article a bit with a more neutral tone and removed the maintenance template. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 13:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Games published by AstraZeneca

Horizon, Bureaucracy Buster, Crestor Challenge is listed as published by AstraZeneca... Is this an error? 140.106.99.225 (talk) 00:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]