Jump to content

Talk:Mayfield, Baltimore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Info Box removal

[edit]

Last week editor Nyttend moved the picture of Mayfield from a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) info box that had been added by GcSwRhIc in October. Nyttend indicated that the move was due to an uncertainty as to whether the homes in the picture were in the registered district. Nyttend pointed out to me that the register of historic places had a clear definition of the specific streets in Mayfield that had been so designated and that the NRHP did not include all of Mayfield. The fact of the matter is that the article was created about the neighborhood, not the registery, so the question is should the info box even be in this article or should it have its own article?«Marylandstater» «reply» 13:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The house in the center of the photo in question is 2402 Lake Avenue. It lies in the heart of Mayfield and the Mayfield Historic District (the boundaries are nearly identical). It is a contributing property as it is one of the “later tract houses and masonry duplexes dating from c. 1920-1945.” Please read the description of the district at the Maryland Historical Trust. Keeping the NRHP templet box in the article falls in line with other Baltimore neighborhoods. GcSwRhIc (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mayfield, Baltimore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mayfield, Baltimore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]