Talk:Mauser HSc

My rejected corrections/revisions to MAUSER HSc text

Regarding the article on Mauser HSc, I was the original author, with two of the listed references being mine and accepted as exhibits on a recognized gun site.

In addition to the arbitrary revision made in wording and text sequence, here are a few key errors:

- Transitional changes during the wartime production of this pistol have been noted as variations which are identified as falling within specific serial number ranges. The incorrect revision states that these variations fall within specific Werhmacht purchase orders which is simply not the case. The term Wehrmacht is incorrect as the pistols focused upon for the bulk of this unfactual revision were for the Army(Heer)procured pistols. - The commercial proofs on these pistols are not a Crown/N, but an Eagle/N (factory firing proof) which superceded the former proof by 1940 when production of this pistol began. This would be very clear to anyone holding or knowing anything about the wartime HSc pistols.

There are text re-arrangements, subjective word changes and omissions from the original article. In view of the stringent requirements by Wikipedia, I simply cannot understand how this unresearched and erroneous revision could have been accepted. Hochadler (talk) 02:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Note - the above text was copied from my talk page [1] as it is more appropriate to hold the discussion here. -- Whpq (talk) 12:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Sourcing

The references added are not inline with the text so it is difficult to establish what source is supposed to confirm what facts. They need to be added with REF tags. -- Whpq (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Screw this

The article mentions that the early pistols had a lower grip screw than later models; which variant is in the photograph? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mauser HSc/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Regarding the article on Mauser HSc, I was the original author, with two of the listed references being mine and accepted as exhibits on a recognized gun site. In addition to the arbitrary revision made in wording and text sequence, here are a few key errors: - Transitional changes during the wartime production of this pistol have been noted as variations which are identified as falling within specific serial number ranges. The incorrect revision states that these variations fall within specific Werhmacht purchase orders which is simply not the case. The term Wehrmacht is incorrect as the pistols focused upon for the bulk of this unfactual revision were for the Army(Heer)procured pistols. - The commercial proofs on these pistols are not a Crown/N, but an Eagle/N (factory firing proof) which superceded the former proof by 1940 when production of this pistol began. This would be very clear to anyone holding or knowing anything about the wartime HSc pistols. There are text re-arrangements, subjective word changes and omissions from the original article. In view of the stringent requirements by Wikipedia, I simply cannot understand how this unresearched and erroneous revision could have been accepted. Hochadler (talk) 15:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 15:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 23:29, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mauser HSc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110817143446/http://gunstribune.com/handguns/germany/mauser-hsc to http://gunstribune.com/handguns/germany/mauser-hsc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

SN 962047 HSC

I recently purchased this SN and from all appearances this pistol is unfired. From the wear of the blue the gun was carried a lot. Included with the pistol is an ad from " The Shotgun News" April 1993, describing the pistol coming from a special made German Police lot from early 1940. Machining is rough and the gun has a lite bluing. The only proof mark is on the trigger guard by the handle and appears to be a V on top of a small circle, but may be a tulip shape. This same mark is on the bottom of the barrel with an S. The inside of the slide is stamped with a V at the hammer clearance. The importer is stamped on the frame on the right side and reads GAI Miami-FL.. Where would I find more information on this gun? thank you in advance. Great article on the HSC 2600:1700:D40:D720:3D1E:1FD8:9E14:B53 (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)