Talk:Marathon 2: Durandal
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Mind if I change PC to Microsoft Windows?
[edit]I just noticed where the link goes and it's not quite accurate. Marathon 2: Durandal ran, IIRC, on Windows 95 and up. Not Windows 3.1 or DOS. I figured this would be accurate and give readers a better idea of exactly what OS it ran on on a PC.--FazzMunkle 09:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm not a registered user, but I think that's a good idea so go right ahead, it's much more useful. However, if you chance PC to Microsoft Windows 95 then you should change Mac to Apple Mac OS n, where n is whatever OS no. it ran on. Cya around, 81.109.94.62 22:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Wow, I just noticed how late I am replying. Well over a year. Sorry man! 81.109.94.62 22:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
favorable reviews for 360 version??
[edit]my xbox magazine completly destroyed it saying its level design is crap and then it is inferior to doom and isnt worth 10 bucks. the only thing they liked was the lobby for multiplayer, thats about it.....
- well i love the game. especially coop. im currently 5th on the coop leaderboard. i think its a great game. and, it doesnt make me motion sick.
Dude this game is far superior to doom in graphics gameplay, and design. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JaredLevi (talk • contribs) 23:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
They can criticize the game all they want... It owns! With Marathon, it isn't about "Amazing graphics" or "Advanced AI". It is one of those all-time classic games, with a good story. And thats what is good about it!
Anyways, I cannot get Multiplayer loading properly. -_-
Dalawong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.109.65.218 (talk) 11:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
A screenshot would be very helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.70.217.97 (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Unsure why Aleph One (Game Engine) links here
[edit]That's all. Clicking on http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Aleph_One_(game_engine) leads here. Plus, there is also a recursive entry within this page to Aleph One. Sparkwoodand21 (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. The best explanation of the Aleph One engine is on the Trilogy page, but I cannot change the redirect because it is protected. I have asked the editor who made the original redirect for help in changing it. --Iritscen (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I think the redirect now points to the best explanation of the engine. Let me know if you have any other suggestions. --Iritscen (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Marathon 2: Durandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907210039/http://www.360sync.com/2008/02/19/gdc-08-day-1-recap to http://www.360sync.com/2008/02/19/gdc-08-day-1-recap
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080420174843/http://www.360sync.com/2008/04/19/marathon-dlc-in-depth-preview-part-1 to http://www.360sync.com/2008/04/19/marathon-dlc-in-depth-preview-part-1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725105014/http://news.freeverse.com/archives/2008/06/17/freeverse-annou-5.php to http://news.freeverse.com/archives/2008/06/17/freeverse-annou-5.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)