Jump to content

Talk:Manila Luzon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 October 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sgonza79.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

iTunes

[edit]

Please see Official links. Nowhere on that list is iTunes prohibited from being a reliable source. iTunes pages do provide important info such as release date, record label, and most importantly they provide a valid reliable source that a single/ablum has been released. Please kindly refrain from making changes to discography section.--XLR8TION (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This has been debated before many times. iTunes is ok if it is the *only* source of a release date. However, you are not using it that way in the article. You openly say it is available for purchase on iTunes. You just give the iTunes link that never sources information. Bgwhite (talk) 16:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • IF you read the music section carefully, it does state release dates for his singleds, which I have obtained from iTunes. With the declining power of the physical music industry, iTunes and Amazon are now the leaders of music distribution, and their info is derived from what music distributors provide them. The discography simply allows readers to refer to the exact link to the single for info pertaining to cover artwork, release date, versions (e.g, remixes), etc. There are many commercial sites that also serves as official sites (for example a company's official website). Adding a link does not necessary state that Wikipedia is being used for commercial gain. This is an information website, and these links do provide info for somethings that I will have trouble posting on iTunes, especially when it comes to copyrighted images and sound. --XLR8TION (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But you are not references the release date. Also, you say you can buy it from iTunes. See User_talk:Drmies/Archive_33#Are_Amazon_and_iTunes_links_spam. Bgwhite (talk) 18:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I said iTunes and other commercial music sites. The main reason I say commercial is to not promote the idea of illegal downloading. Most artists only release commercial sites in order to generate royalties. Some (like Prince) release their music for free. --XLR8TION (talk) 18:58, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter as you cannot promote the buying of the music. All somebody has to do is look at the official website or do a simple search. The promotion has to be removed. They way you are linking to iTunes has to be removed. We are supposed to be giving info about the person, not the buying of the music. Bgwhite (talk) 19:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, the discography links the reader to the single/album's main page. This is not a commercial promotions, simply. Once again, lease see Official links. Nowhere on that list is iTunes prohibited from being a reliable source.--XLR8TION (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are not understanding. You CAN use iTunes as a REFERENCE if no other reference is available. I'm NOT saying it can't be used as a reliable reference. In the article, you say you can buy at iTunes and only give a general link. You are using it as promotion, not for a reference. Official links doesn't mention any specific example... you are also barking up the wrong tree. Official links is for links given in the external links section and not as a reliable source. It is for an OFFICIAL link the person runs or only about the person, such as an Official website. Bgwhite (talk) 21:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am not using it as a promotional link. The purpose of the link is to allow the reader to visually see the single's information on a site that can provide him/her information on artwork, release date, and in some cases, sound as many sites do provide sound samples. The list I have referred to does NOT prohibit the use of iTunes. Many artists on this site have iTunes links, and surpringly only Manila's article is being assaulted. Why the double standard? It boggles my mind. Let's focus on creating articles and not creating headaches or drama for editors who want to create a well-rounded, referenced article. The list I have referred to is from Wikipedia's official help pages. It's not user created. Hence, it's is there to provide guidance and direction. That's what I'm doing.--XLR8TION (talk) 22:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Three people have said it is promotional. You know WP:OTHERSTUFF exists and always will. I delete promotional iTunes and Amazon links when I see it. I delete social medial links when an official website is given. I cannot delete things I haven't seen. Bgwhite (talk) 23:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What three people? It's just you and that's it in this conversation. Please don't fib and make up make believe editors to justify your removal of the links. --XLR8TION (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can read the history as well as we can. Drmies (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive Edits

[edit]

Please do not discuss All-Stars activity on Manila's page. That should be discussed on the series article page just like all other previous seasons of Drag Race covered episode highlight's on their respective season's page. Second, your grammar is really bad. Your punctuation is lacking and your repetitive use of the words should an apparent lacking of proper grammar. Please stop reverting the edits I have made. Prior to yesterday, NO ONE complained about the article's grammar.

Also DO NOT write on my Talk Page. This should be discussed only on this article. One more edit on my page and I will file a vandalism grievance with this site. --XLR8TION (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Manila's article SHOULD NOT contain detailed episode-per-episode recaps. That is redundant info that will be covered in the All-Stars article. Manila's article should only cover personal achievements. Once All-Stars is over, a recap on his achievements such as challenge wins, and possibly, winning the contest can be included. In the meantime there are still 5 more weeks to go before there is a winner. --XLR8TION (talk) 18:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please Do Not Bite The Newcomers

[edit]

Please Do Not Bite The Newcomers, this is Wikipedia policy, Learn how to speak to your fellow editors because they are not going away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varonil0 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you threatening me? That's real classy buddy. Learn the basics of civil dialogue. If it gets too hot in the kitchen, then stay out.--XLR8TION (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ok with other people putting in their input? Please do not call me buddy. There is nothing threatening about this statement, Remember the 5 G's , Good God Get A Grip Girl! I was merely stating to be less rude in the future with newcomers. Remember I am here to learn from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.168.92.66 (talk) 20:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see no threats. It should never be "hot in the kitchen" around here. Sorry, newbie. As you can see from above, unfortunately XLR8TION does not work well with others and has laid an invalid claim of ownership over this article. What are you trying to add? Does it have a reference? Bgwhite (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
BGWhite, yoour mind is like a spinning top: no creativity but keeps spinning. I would refrain from insults and false claims because it's apparent you're not a award-winning caliber author from some of your past unconstructive puerile edits.--XLR8TION (talk) 20:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BGWHITE, I already added something on MTV's Made, that was my add-on, I can see that XLR does not work well with others, but to each it's own, He has to know that he doesn't Own the internet. Never forget that and Once again, XLR, no one cares about your award-winning status, I don't see you as award-winning caliber but thanks for contributing to the pages. Let's all work together in harmony. This should be fun Let's work together queens and document this herstory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varonil0 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I looked at the history of the page.
First off, per Wikipedia rules, both of you should be blocked for violating the 3RR rule.
I agree with XLR8TION that the dress comment shouldn't be added. Not sure if it is a "shameless plug" as XLR8TION said, but it is not encyclopedic and is a very minor detail.
The second addition could be added. I know nothing about the show, but if Luzon teamed up with Latrice Royale for the majority of the show, it could be added. However, the reference that came along with it is not good as it is a video. If there was a better reference that showed the two were paired up for however long, then it could be added. But, I'd have to see the ref first. Bgwhite (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Bgwhite, appreciate your help and I will work on being a better Wikipediar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varonil0 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Birth day

[edit]

So I noticed the article had a crazy birth day of Aug 10, 1984.

I can source Aug 1981 from: http://radaris.com/~Karl-Westerberg/428106393

and 1981 from: http://www.mylife.com/karlwesterberg

Anyhow I know he graduated HS class of 1999 and have grade school year books verifying the same (Gethsemane Lutheran School, Maplewood, MN)

Without paying for information, I can't do better than Aug 1984.

So I fixed the date to just the verifiable 1981.

Can someone with a public records account verify?

Or should we just assume that the Aug 10 part was correct and make it Aug 10 1981?

--174.20.97.243 (talk) 03:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Because this is somehow still an issue, here's yet another source pointing to a 1981 birth date, and not the more recent ones that keep getting added.

http://web.archive.org/web/20021208081846/http://www.d.umn.edu/~west0522/resume.html

69.24.174.220 (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abrupt change of gender in Personal Life

[edit]

I left the "he" because I assume this applies to Westerberg if he is not cross-dressing 24/7. But without any guidance, I changed the "he" in the last sentence to "Luzon" -- why this last name is not used throughout the article confounds me ( not sure if https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Gender_identity applies to drag). A name must be used because it follows a sentence using another "he" -- for the same reason, a name (not he or she) should be used in the first sentence as well. 72.200.20.62 (talk) 03:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC) (Dfoofnik not logged in)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manila Luzon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References located at Personal Life?

[edit]

Hello,

I was checking this article and noticed something weird. All the references are located at the tab 'social life'. I have tried to move them, but I did not succeed. Is there anyone who can do this?

Sincerely, NeoMeesje (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manila Luzon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

[edit]

On tonight's episode, Manila Luzon said she wanted her Wikipedia article to reflect her win. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that! Made me smile. Armadillopteryxtalk 00:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Ruins Christmas: The Musical

[edit]

To add: Trinity Ruins Christmas: The Musical

---Another Believer (Talk) 15:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Manila_Luzon&oldid=1257895837"