Talk:Mama Said Knock You Out

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 01:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that the album is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 06:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– The album (this month) seems more viewed than the rap song (this month). However, either they just clicked to the song on the hatnote without reading the article, or they read just the intro and then surfed to the song. Also, neither album nor song is more significant than the other, especially by reading the articles, even when the album spawned a few or several singles. By the way, I revived the disambiguation page because I found television episodes using the same name. George Ho (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 00:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. A hatnote is sufficient in this case. Calidum 03:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Opppose per Calidum. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This is a WP:TWODABS situation in spirit, in which the album receives thousands more hits than the song. The current status quo seems to be working.--Cúchullain ^t/c 21:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 16 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. The answer is still no ; wbm1058 (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– Somehow, the stats that I provided in last RM seems different from what the stats supposed to be at that time. Looking at the last 90 days, there is no way that, despite high stat numbers, the album is more popular and more significant than the rap song itself. The album had singles, but the song inspired pop culture to make reference to the song itself. Also, the dabpage has episodes whose title of the same name is based on the song itself. Consensus opposed the proposal in last RM, but I believe consensus can change. George Ho (talk) 08:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support In ictu oculi (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the fact that the song comes from the album, the record can reasonably be considered to have greater significance. Nohomersryan (talk) 13:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's no longer the case, Ryan (if that's your actual name). Like a Virgin, Baby One More Time, Oops!... I Did It Again, and Like a Prayer have both albums and songs of the same name that are equally significant. Even the song may have a lot of significance probably due to its name being satirized in popular culture. --George Ho (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The album gets 60% of the page views. That means that even if every reader looking for the song got there by going to the album first, there are still thousands more that intended the album. Especially considering that is effectively a WP:TWODABS situation, with the song linked in a hat note, moving the dab page to the base name would be of no benefit.--Cúchullain ^t/c 17:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Cúchullain. Insert CleverPhrase Here 06:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Agreed with Chuchu. A hatnote is sufficient in this circumstance. Feedback 15:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mama Said Knock You Out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://ca.music.yahoo.com/read/review/12025968
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151107071911/http://rateyourmusic.com/list/tha_flu/chris_rocks_top_25_hip_hop_albums/ to http://rateyourmusic.com/list/tha_flu/chris_rocks_top_25_hip_hop_albums

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]