Talk:Machina/The Machines of God

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Alternative music: Smashing Pumpkins Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of The Smashing Pumpkins task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Glass and the Machines of God

I don't think the Glass and the Machines of God web series should be on this album page. It is an extension of a story that was introduced with Machina and Machina II but not related to either album's release. It also wasn't a promotional tool for the album. I think it should either have its own page or there should be a Machina story page that details all released story content: both machina albums, the web series and the stories that Billy Corgan wrote. Edgessouth 21:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cult Classic?

How is this album a "cult classic"? I've searched on the internet about this album before, and I've never seen any traces of an existing "cult". Underwater 23:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's not really true. Folkor 04:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm just going to delete the whole part... Underwater 02:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is almost universally hated in the smashing pumpkins internet community...does that make this record a cult classic? Also, I WANT MY MONEY BACK MR. CORGAN, this album is shit!!!Sickboy3883 22:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, anything after Adore is usually hated by SP fans... Blame Corgan. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 20:28, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Material from Pumpkins page

A revision of the paragraph about this album on the Smashing Pumpkins has been moved here. The main page needs to be trimmed down a bit, so here's hoping someone can do something with this here:

MACHINA was initially promoted as the Pumpkins' return to form, after the more gothic, electronic-sounding Adore; however, on its release, many reviewers and fans took issue with the album's "Wall of Sound" production, finding that what was intended to have been a reappearance of the band's signature rock sound had been overprocessed — in particular, stripping away the warmth and nuance for which Iha's and Corgan's guitar work had become known. In addition, many longtime fans became disenchanted with the conceptual nature of the album and its mystical and spiritual themes. These themes, however, served to draw the more adamant Pumpkins fans in and lead them on a search for the underlying 'meaning' of the album (that many now claim to have been a wild goose chase). This was commonly referred to as the "Machina Mystery". It involved cryptic comments from Corgan, the esoteric album artwork (illustrated by Vasily Kavanov) that possibly included a prophecy of the band's date of demise (the numbers '5/23' were embedded in an illustration), and off-the-wall notes written by Corgan and passed out at concerts ("Do you know who your Savior is???"). In September of 2000, Corgan himself held a "Machina Mystery Contest", wherein fans wrote essays on, and interpretations of, the 'Machina Mystery'. Over 100 runners-up had their essays signed and returned by Corgan, while one winner was to receive tickets to the band's final show. [1] The symbolism and iconography in Machina led many to believe Corgan had finally made the dive into the deep end of egomania and demagoguery, though Corgan later claimed to simply be his acting a "cartoon" role of the media's representations of him and his band. [2]

MACHINA = acronym?

Is the first part of the albums's title some sort of acronym or why is it capitalized? - Cyrus XIII 13:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This album is connected

All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages. Godlord2 20:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The smashing pumpkins machina cover.jpg

Image:The smashing pumpkins machina cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Bug?

Something screwy is going on at the moment - the album chart table is not visible, and the personnel is small and embedded in the reference chart! Not sure what's going on - the code is correct. Hopefully this will fix itself or I'm just going crazy. -Werideatdusk33 00:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Machina Diagram

Billy Corgan hand-drew a diagram with a bunch of the Machina and Machina II songs that explains how they are thematically connected. It was somehow released on the Internet and I have it on my computer. I think it would be very helpful in both articles to demonstrate their "concept album" aspect and to better explain the flow of the songs and the creative genesis of the project. I'd like to upload it but am unsure as to what licensing it is. Does anyone know what I'm talking about, and, if so, what license? -Werideatdusk33 (talk) 19:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Footage of Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness

There is claim that there is footage of the recording for Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness. Does anyone know if these have been released. And where can I find them.

This would be a much better question for Talk:Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness, but here's your answer anyway: MTV recorded some video footage of the MCIS recording sessions in early March 1995. It has not been officially released. hbent (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification on Pitchfork review

The Pitchfork review does not, as stated before my edit, criticize Chamberlin's drumming style. The reviewer makes a passing reference to Chamberlin "doing his best Neil Peart impression," which isn't an insult. Bdure (talk) 15:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC) bdure[reply]

I'm not sure which review you're reading. Specifically, the writer says "Chamberlin's overproduced, steady clicking on MACHINA sounds exactly like-- and might as well be-- a drum machine.".The Review Nonetheless, the thrust of the criticism was really about the production style, so it is pretty unnecessary to mention. But, really, who would criticize Chamberlin's drumming out of all things to criticize? -Werideatdusk33 (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revamping article

I've been working the last few pages to revamp the article. It's always felt lacking, esp. compared to what was written for the previous three albums, and even the two new ones, so I've tried to find some narrative thrust and lay out the making and release of the album coherently. Corgan has talked about the album a couple times this year and his comments really clarified the actuality of the album's release.... how the GATMOG concept was initially planned compared to how it actually manifested...

Anyways, what's missing now is a bit more coverage of the release with actual sources from 1999-2001. I can remember there being quite a bit of excitement over the "Machina mystery" and all these bits getting doled out, so any vintage sources anyone can find about that would really clarify things. I would appreciate anyone with a bit of perspective on the album and its release to weigh in and help correct any inaccuracies or omissions that might be present. Thanks a lot! It is finished when seven are one! -Werideatdusk33 (talk) 09:06, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still Becoming Apart

Admins keep deleting it, saying it doesn't warrant an article, but maybe it could be on this article since it was released with Machina. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 20:27, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Machina/The Machines of God. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.mtv.com/sendme.tin?page=/mtv/music/reviews/archive/blather/smashing_pumpkins_00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Machina/The Machines of God/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start class:

Y A reasonably complete infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
Y A track listing
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

Y All the start class criteria
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B class:

Y All the C class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
Y No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS

Missing a lot of citation in many areas. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:52, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:52, 30 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 04:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Machina/The Machines of God. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/sendme.tin?page=%2Fmtv%2Fmusic%2Freviews%2Farchive%2Fblather%2Fsmashing_pumpkins_00.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716115025/http://www.spfreaks.com/default.aspx?page=COLLDETAILS&item=882 to http://www.spfreaks.com/default.aspx?page=COLLDETAILS&item=882

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Machina/The Machines of God. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]