Talk:MKS Ruch Zdzieszowice

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Lrg ruchzdzieszowice.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lrg ruchzdzieszowice.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:37, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move page. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 04:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HKS Ruch Zdzieszowice → Ruch Zdzieszowice – the adopted nomenclature of articles relating to clubs in Poland (for example, it is Lech Poznań, not KKS Lech Poznań). Atlantico 000 (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Talk:OKS Stomil Olsztyn#Requested move 10 March 2022

Hi, has a recent discussion resulted in consensus to move all of them? If so, can you please point us to it? Because otherwise this RM from a year and a half ago applies. Dr. Vogel (talk) 01:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Haven't seen this discussion. I just pointed out that only these 3 articles about clubs in Poland have prefixes in their names (like OKS or MPK); in the rest they are not (instead of KP Legia Warsaw, there will be Legia Warsaw, and a possible section in parentheses). What should I do in this situation? To start a discussion on the change of the name of Stomil, is this argument for the restoration of the proposed names sufficient? If it is not enough, then I am asking for the restoration of Pogoń Siedlce and Ruch Zdzieszowice, and in the case of Stomil Olsztyn I will take other steps. Atlantico 000 (talk) 07:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Given the recent RM about one of them going in the opposite direction, I'd be apprehensive about making these moves without a new RM. Dr. Vogel (talk) 13:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 22:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural oppose - these articles should not be bundled like this. Giant Snowman 22:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? Atlantico 000 (talk) 15:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Because each club should be considered separate. see WP:TRAINWRECK. Giant Snowman 09:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  @GeoffreyT2000: was the user who did it like this. Please refer to this. Atlantico 000 (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Separated from Talk:OKS Stomil Olsztyn#Requested move 10 March 2022 per GiantSnowman's comment there. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 21:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per consensus at Talk:OKS Stomil Olsztyn#Requested move 22 September 2020. Giant Snowman 21:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @GiantSnowman: It seems to me that you relate this to the discussion about Stomil, and this is the discussion about the Ruch Zdzieszowice club. I hope that referring to the names of clubs in Poland + the fact that the club is no longer called HKS but MKS, you will support the proposal to change the name of the article. Atlantico 000 (talk) 11:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: In my opinion, user GiantSnowman's objection contains factual errors and should not be taken into account. However, he has the opportunity to respond to it by withdrawing the objection. Atlantico 000 (talk) 13:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In my opinion, if my proposal was to be rejected, the name of the article cannot remain under the current name anyway, because the club changed the prefix. Atlantico 000 (talk) 17:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support These prefixes change very often with Polish clubs, we should be using WP:COMMONNAME, otherwise we would be moving thousands of pages all the time.Abcmaxx (talk) 10:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Soorma221 (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Struck as blocked as a sockpuppet of Atlantico 000[reply]
Oppose This is not the "adopted nomenclature" of Polish football clubs. Number 5 7 13:12, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.