Talk:MHV amplitudes
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
MHV amplitudes are not a method. They are amplitudes. Second, if I remember correctly, its not true, except in supersymmetric theories, that the other amplitudes M(all +'s) and M(all + and one -) vanish. At tree level they vanish, but I think even if you look at the original Parke Taylor paper, they write an O(g^4) contribution. Jacob2718 (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Move to Maximally helicity violating (MHV) amplitudes
[edit]The acronym for this topic is very unlikely to be known to anyone not working in the field. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)