Talk:MGM+/Archive 1

Archive 1

Category:Television channels and stations established in 2009

Who keeps erasing the "television channels and stations established in 2009" category? --68.37.66.81 (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

I am, because there is no announced air date. The category is called "Channels and stations established in 2009", not "Channels and stations that might begin airing in 2009, but we don't know yet". Judging from the lack of carriage for this network so far, 2010 seems much more likely, but until it actually comes on the air, founding cats stay out of the article. Nate • (chatter) 04:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete the link, you will be banned from Wikipedia. --NewYorkCity101 (talk) 11:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

I see you have a username now. The category remains deleted until we actually see it on the air. Nate • (chatter) 13:55, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed. --NewYorkCity101 (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

FiOS is not IPTV

This article incorrectly stated that Verizon FiOS was an IPTV service. FiOS does not run IPTV for it's main channels and uses QAM over Fibre. I've changed the article to remove the IPTV reference. Dewdude (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Epix coming soon to AT&T U-verse

Last night I discovered that all the Epix channels were coming to AT&T U-verse very soon. Here is the proof of what I discovered on my U-verse box:

891 - Epix
892 - Epix W
893 - Epix 2
896 - Epix DI
1891 - Epix HD
1892 - Epix W HD
1893 - Epix 2 HD
1894 - Epix 3 HD

I also discovered last week that the movie Star Trek Into Darkness was playing on one of the Epix channels. Look familiar to you? AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Start date and age are only used for people, not companies.

Start date and age are only used for people, not companies like Epix. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Improve this article

Both the Background and History sections are too verbose and filled with excruciating detail. Can someone please condense it? Lynxx2 (talk) 05:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Pronunciation

I just saw an online commercial for an original Epix series, and the narrator pronounced the channel's name as "epics," not "epic" as indicated in this article. Should the pronunciation be changed? Or is there a source for the "epic" pronunciation?dancheatham (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 24 August 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per nom. While the decision is borderline, evidence provided by Amakuru tilted it towards the move. No such user (talk) 06:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

---

• Epix (TV network) → Epix
• Epix → Epix (disambiguation)

– I think the television network is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. 94.67.58.247 (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose - Personally I'd say at the moment Samsung SGH-i907 is the primarytopic. –Davey2010^Talk 19:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
• Support The nominator's statement is poor, but we shouldn't be so quick to count out this proposal. Epix (TV network) is the clear primary topic in terms of usage, with the Samsung and the pharmaceuticals being sparsely viewed. As for long-term significance, nothing shows that the other two are in any way more encyclopedically notable than the TV network. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 03:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
• Support move because the Epix TV network is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, not the Samsung Epix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.4.146 (talk) 17:40, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

You have already !voted by nominating the article. - SummerPhD^v2.0 18:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose – This is what disambig pages are for. "I think" is not a sensible rationale for a primarytopic grab. Dicklyon (talk) 03:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
• Support. The TV network seems to be primary topic by both common usage and long term significance. Also it dwarfs the other two for page views.[1] This is what primary topic is all about.  — Amakuru (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Speedily closed. This is an uncontroversial request, the page will be moved on the 15th (EST) once the announced name change takes effect. An RM is unnecessary and will only waste editors' time. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

---

Epix → MGM+ – 112.200.12.134 (talk) 06:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.