Talk:Lunarcrete

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 May 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

Astronomy: Moon / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Moon task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from AstroCrete was copied or moved into Lunarcrete. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled

A Google search reveals no use of the Lunarcrete associated with Beyer, but it does show the word as the name of a company. Delete? JamesBWatson (talk) 16:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated it for AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunarcrete. A v N 17:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added new section on Sulfur based waterless concrete

Just to say I added this section and the next one. Seemed likely to be totally non controversial to add this so just went ahead and following "be bold" added it to the article. I couldn't find much about it here in wikipedia except the article on Sulfur concrete. Robert Walker (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of AstroCrete into Lunarcrete

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was no consensus. Merge discussion closed. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AstroCrete does not appear to be sufficiently and instead could simply be a section in Lunarcrete Polyamorph (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed Merge of AstroCrete into Lunarcrete (2)

AstroCrete does not appear to be have sufficient independent notability and could instead be dealt with in a section in the existing article Lunarcrete. The previous merge proposal received zero comments and was closed as no consensus so I am re-listing and posting at relevant wikiprojects to attract some comments from interested editors. Polyamorph (talk) 08:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, the sourced AstroCrete page is a specific form of lunar material, not an overall view of the topic. Have added it as a 'See also'. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose, they're different materials. It could use some cleanup however as the page seems to be in the style of an academic paper instead of an article. Nigos (talk c) 04:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC) Support, not really notable, it’s best to be in a subsection Nigos (talk | contribs) 23:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They're both formed from regolith. It just seems "Astrocrete" contains human blood/urea as a binding agent.Polyamorph (talk) 18:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guess you’re right, I’ve changed it to support Nigos (talk | contribs) 23:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Astrocrete comes after lunacrete, since a lunar base is the most probable first base on a planet. I would put the Astrocrete as a subsection into the lunar version.--Geysirhead (talk) 16:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have now had chance to read and do agree on balance that a merger might be best. SUPPORT GRALISTAIR (talk) 15:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Geysirhead (talk) 17:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]