Jump to content

Talk:Luigi Mangione

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

| website

[edit]

I would like to hear any arguments against including the subjects website in their own infobox Trade (talk) 17:15, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which website? guninvalid (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The one currently in the infobox Trade (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. luigimangioneinfo.com is not his official website and does not claim to be. guninvalid (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. The website is not his own official website. It is his legal defense creating a website to post relevant documents. I guess you could nitpick what "official website" means (as you did by calling my edit "nonsensical" and reverting it), but the spirit of this certainly is that it is someone's website about them and their work, not a tool used by lawyers to consolidate legal information and paint the narrative that he is innocent. Upjav (talk) 18:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From the website: "Due to the extraordinary volume of inquiries and outpouring of support, this site was created and is maintained by Luigi Mangione’s New York legal defense team to provide answers to frequently asked questions, accurate information about his cases, and dispel misinformation. The intent is to share factual information regarding the unprecedented, multiple prosecutions against him." Upjav (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That makes it the official website of his defense, but not of Mangione himself. I'd say this fails WP:ELOFFICIAL #1, and #2 doesn't apply. guninvalid (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mangione is controlling the website. He just have his legal team doing it on his behalf for obvious reasons Trade (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The only thing i called nonsensical was your claim of the site being a form of "promotional" Trade (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
May have been the wrong wording. I was thinking of the donation solicitation aspect of it. Otherwise, sure, I can retract the use of "promotional". Upjav (talk) 18:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Restore the link. The lawyers are agents of Mangione and therefore the website belongs to him. Anne drew (talk · contribs) 14:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Restore. It has his name in it, it's by his legal team, it has a quote from him for the website right at the top, and despite the technicality, many sources refer to it as his website or that "Luigi Mangione Launches New Website" in headlines and/or bodies. It's a practical inclusion. Underdevelopedprefrontalcortex (talk) 03:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Restore. The website is ran by his legal team and is a platform for his voice and case. There is no reason to not have it. Tbrennan0827 (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've readded the website due to, by my count, 4-2 consensus in favor of restoration. Underdevelopedprefrontalcortex (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request

[edit]

In the intro, in the third paragraph, where it mentions “ Opinion polls found a plurality of American adult respondents held a negative view toward Mangione, with younger and left-leaning respondents more likely to support him”, please add the word older before the word adult. Most of the people supporting him are adults, mostly younger adults. 2600:100C:A20D:BB75:C97A:70A4:5237:D039 (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The lead already says this, right after: with younger and left-leaning respondents more likely to support him. guninvalid (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: While I can see the IP's concerns, after reviewing the relevant sources and polls, given the lead needs to summarize things it's likely it's current wording is sufficient. The age gap is more clearly defined in the specific section on opinion polling. In other words, declining request per guninvalid which, even if I did not agree, the request would still be declined procedurally as it has become disputed by an editor, making it ineligible to remain in the queue. —Sirdog (talk) 23:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
These sentences are the kind of bias you would see on Fox News. Plurality of American adult respondents. Might as well say he has gained support among adults worldwide who are shocked at the profit mongering ofAmerican healthcare by insurers. 173.209.162.8 (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2025

[edit]

In the 'State and Federal charges' section, it says he was charged on November 9, 2024, when it was actually in December. Expurplejesus (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done It does appear to be Dec 9th according to sources. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:01, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Change fair use image to free image

[edit]

There is this public domain image from a federal complaint document in Wikisource, and apparently it hasn't been transferred to Commons yet. HyperAnd (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The image from the federal complaint document was discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Luigi Mangione; the outcome was to delete as the copyright status of the image was dubious at best. Some1 (talk) 22:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, interesting. Also, you mistyped the link (didn't include "Commons:") HyperAnd (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]