The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
A fact from Luigi Mangione appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 January 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Luigi Mangione was described as "somewhat of an online sex symbol" following his December 2024 arrest?
Remove. The website is not his own official website. It is his legal defense creating a website to post relevant documents. I guess you could nitpick what "official website" means (as you did by calling my edit "nonsensical" and reverting it), but the spirit of this certainly is that it is someone's website about them and their work, not a tool used by lawyers to consolidate legal information and paint the narrative that he is innocent. Upjav (talk) 18:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
From the website: "Due to the extraordinary volume of inquiries and outpouring of support, this site was created and is maintained by Luigi Mangione’s New York legal defense team to provide answers to frequently asked questions, accurate information about his cases, and dispel misinformation. The intent is to share factual information regarding the unprecedented, multiple prosecutions against him." Upjav (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
May have been the wrong wording. I was thinking of the donation solicitation aspect of it. Otherwise, sure, I can retract the use of "promotional". Upjav (talk) 18:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Restore. It has his name in it, it's by his legal team, it has a quote from him for the website right at the top, and despite the technicality, many sources refer to it as his website or that "Luigi Mangione Launches New Website" in headlines and/or bodies. It's a practical inclusion. Underdevelopedprefrontalcortex (talk) 03:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the intro, in the third paragraph, where it mentions “ Opinion polls found a plurality of American adult respondents held a negative view toward Mangione, with younger and left-leaning respondents more likely to support him”, please add the word older before the word adult. Most of the people supporting him are adults, mostly younger adults. 2600:100C:A20D:BB75:C97A:70A4:5237:D039 (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: While I can see the IP's concerns, after reviewing the relevant sources and polls, given the lead needs to summarize things it's likely it's current wording is sufficient. The age gap is more clearly defined in the specific section on opinion polling. In other words, declining request per guninvalid which, even if I did not agree, the request would still be declined procedurally as it has become disputed by an editor, making it ineligible to remain in the queue. —Sirdog(talk) 23:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
These sentences are the kind of bias you would see on Fox News. Plurality of American adult respondents. Might as well say he has gained support among adults worldwide who are shocked at the profit mongering ofAmerican healthcare by insurers. 173.209.162.8 (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]