Talk:Lucky (American TV series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lucky (American TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 20 August 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move page. (non-admin closure) — YoungForever^(talk) 18:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky (TV series) → Lucky (American TV series) – Necessary disambiguation from the 2006 Indian television series of the same name, as per WP:INCDAB. And, no – the short-lived American series is not the primary subtopic: [1]. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. --Ab207 (talk) 14:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing with brackets after it can be a WP Primary Topic by definition. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support views are around the same which means it clearly shouldn't be a PDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the rationale and the provided statistics. ╠╣uw [talk] 17:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.