Jump to content

Talk:Louis Armstrong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleLouis Armstrong is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 19, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
October 20, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Semi-protected edit request on 17 October 2024

[edit]

Update section about the Louis Armstrong musical. The show did not begin previews on Broadway on 10/16/2024 at Studio 54. RainfromNYC (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We should 100% change the image

[edit]

This image on Commons was restored by me and then by Yann, and by every standard this is the better image. Not only is it color but it is higher quality with it being about 6,000 pixels. I believe that this should be the main image, but I have to discuss this on the talk page. Thoughts? Wcamp9 (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You keep making the same points that are either marginal or totally irrelevant. It needs to be reiterated that the following are not themselves compelling criteria for whether an image should be the lead illustration of a biography:
  1. Whether it is in color or black and white
  2. Its native resolution, given it is displayed in the article at thumbnail size
  3. What users have edited it or the editing work they have done
  4. What status it has beyond the internal consensus for placement in the article in question
You need to acknowledge these basic points or we can't progress any further. Remsense ‥  22:17, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK fine, but you have to let me make my points before absolutely going off and reverting my every move that I do like your monitoring me. I think ignoring these points, we can say that it really is subjective to which image is better. When I Googled Louis Armstrong images I found that there are slightly more results showing the image I want than the one that you reverted it to. But at an encyclopedic standpoint, it would be great to see an image showing the colors of one of the first popular African American entertainers. Wcamp9 (talk) 01:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry but you are plainly wrong when you say that the color is irrelevant. Color is certainly a defining part of the physical appearance of a person. I support replacing the lead image with the color image and oppose unnecessary black-and-white images. ―Howard🌽33 20:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree Wcamp9 (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]