Talk:Longford River
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Longford River map. |
canal not river
[edit]I've changed the project to waterways as it is an early canal not a natural river Jonathan Cardy (talk) 23:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Interpretation of the schematic
[edit]At the head of the schematic there are two downward pointing arrows with no continuation paths, nor, so far as I can see, any note about where they go. I'm assuming the don;t end up in a marsh, so would someone please interpret the diagram for me or tell me what I am missing? Adding that clarification to the article would also be useful, please. Fiddle Faddle 22:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- They are distributaries of the River Colne. I have now annotated them. Bob1960evens (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Longford River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120210105720/http%3A//www.royalparks.org.uk/docs/bushy_telegraph_8.pdf to http://www.royalparks.org.uk/docs/bushy_telegraph_8.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- C-Class UK geography articles
- Low-importance UK geography articles
- C-Class UK Waterways articles
- Mid-importance UK Waterways articles
- WikiProject UK Waterways
- C-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- C-Class Civil engineering articles
- Low-importance Civil engineering articles
- WikiProject Civil engineering articles