Talk:London and Southampton Railway

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The London and South Western Railway page is all lop-sided; the text already there goes into huge detail, but some other topics are not covered at all. It is already a long article. As discussed there in its talk page, I propose to write this London and Southampton Railway article with all the detail of the gestation of the original line, and then to reduce the reference to this phase to a short summary on the LSWR page itself.

What is here now is just a placeholder, to be refined, and made compliant with wikipedia standards. Afterbrunel (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Route diagram template

There is an unused template showing the company's route: {{London and Southampton Railway}}. I cannot speak to whether it is accurate or would be a useful addition; if no, then I'm going to nominate it for deletion but I thought I'd ask here first. Best, Mackensen (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]