Talk:London Central

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Bus route 63.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:

File:Bus route 63.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:London central logo.png has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Book reference out of date

The route contracts are changing regularly due to a 5-7 year contract length with different routes up for tender every year. Why is a book from 2015 an acceptable reference but http://thetflbusesblog.blogspot.co.uk/p/tendering-results.html is considered unacceptable? LondonBusPilot (talk) 11:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LondonBusPilot, read our guidelines on notability. A source needs to be reliable, the blog that you mentioned fails our criteria on being original research. Nightfury 08:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]