Talk:London Buses route 117

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Buses route 117. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714194654/http://www.busandcoach.com/newspage.aspx?id=338&categoryid=0 to http://www.busandcoach.com/newspage.aspx?id=338&categoryid=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of material by Andrew Riley

With regards to Jeni's attempted wholescale revert to Andrew Riley's recent edits made to the page I would like to ask, on the article talk page what exactly Jeni finds unreliable about TfL's website, which is considered to be a reliable primary source. Wikipedia policy dictates that someone is entitled to remove contested unreliable sources, and claims sourced to those sources; however from what I can see here, the 'revert' button is being used as as a catch-all club, by doing so, the removal of cited material occurs, which is considered to be a form of vandalism. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]