Talk:Locus (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Science Fiction High‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Is Locus a reliable source of information? If not, it should be stated in the article somehow. Otherwise embarrassment may result. Itayb 20:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Itayb has left the building, but passersby should note that the link above is to part of the Locus On-line April Fool's Day issue. Just in case. RLetson 05:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To be completely clear, Locus is a VERY reliable source of information. it is THE trade journal, or semi-pro-zine, for SF/fantasy literature. As RLetson knows, but is polite enough to not say. Since I am not associated with them, I can. Can you say "library of congress style moveable bookshelves"? I knew you could.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 10:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, a magazine that's called "toilet" and that doesn't care about most Fantasy (as in all the Fantasy that's not in english) doesn't seem that defining. 92.75.195.250 (talk) 06:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Locus (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5yUueQukn?url=http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-categories/ to http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-categories/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Locus Online merge discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Proposal was unopposed for over a month, so I will WP:BOLDly carry out the merge. -2pou (talk) 00:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Locus Online seems to have started semi-independent of the print magazine per the article, but it appears as though it is now officially run by the greater Locus Magazine staff, according to the former editor-in-chief's bio page. The content of the Locus Online stub is so small as well. I propose merging into the greater magazine article where I think it would serve just fine as a subsection. -2pou (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.