Talk:Lockout (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Escape from L.A.

Is this a remake of Escape from L.A. ? The premise seems similar. 86.198.185.10 (talk) 11:34, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- More like Escape from New York with a little bit of Escape from L.A. thrown in. I like to think of it as Escape from New York in space. --64.233.26.20 (talk) 18:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - When I first saw the trailer I thought they desperatly wanted to make an "Escape from..." movie and had that space-script ready when they realized they wouldnt get a license. And then they did it anyway. And then they ate their own shoes. Just speculation though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.122.133.67 (talk) 10:57, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Should the court case between John Carpenter and EuropaCorp over the similarities be mentioned in the article? It was ruled in Carpenter's favor. http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/john-carpenter-wins-plagiarism-case-against-luc-besson-over-lockout-20151015 184.53.32.179 (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Someone wanna undetail (horrible English) that plot summary? I'm not really sure of myself enough to go about it properly, but it's at least 1500 words and it really doesn't need to be that long. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.166.30 (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ending

At the end of the film when Harry Shaw is gloating about the fact that he'll only serve a few years due to his position as a Secret Service agent, and in turn his knowledge of government secrets, Snow attacks him with a lighter and burns him under his left eye. I don't know if it was the intention of the writer or not, but that would leave him scarred the in same way that Hydell was (the psychotic brother of the convict leader). Earlier in the movie Snow explains to Emilie Warnock that prisoners do this to those among them who are considered "rats".

I guess I'm asking a question here more than anything because it's difficult to tell whether or not this scene was significant, but it's food for thought none the less. Did Snow burn him like that with the intention of making him look like a rat so that his new prison neighbours would turn on him? It looked that way to me, it seemed too convenient to be a coincidence, but it's hard to tell. If someone can ever actually confirm that is what happened, it might be worth adding to the plot summary in the article. Because it does kinda change the tone of the film's ending.--77.103.237.230 (talk) 03:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The villains

Hasn't anybody ever complained, that all the villains talk irish english? Alissem (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC).[reply]

That's a Scottish accent: "He's from Glasgow. Along with his brother. ... I hope my Glasgow accent goes down alright...". Andrew🐉(talk) 11:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lockout (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101027083004/http://thefilmstage.com/2010/08/05/luc-besson-to-lockout-maggie-grace-guy-pearce/ to http://thefilmstage.com/2010/08/05/luc-besson-to-lockout-maggie-grace-guy-pearce/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]