This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
When I edited this page a few minutes ago, I gave the reason for the edit as "No citation for the claim that the Salier and the Hohenstaufer were descended from Liudolf" Clearly this reasoning does not stand up to scrutinty, and the Hohenstaufer and the Salier were quite clearly descended from Liudolf, just not in a direct male line. That is what I meant, that they were not descended from Liudolf in a direct male line. The original format was improper, as we, for example, do not show Philip I of Castile as being a member of the house of Bourbon or the house of Lorraine, even though the later house of Bourbon and the later house of Lorraine did descend from him. I am sorry for my lackluster reasoning when making this edit. UmbrellaTheLeef (talk) 12:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Pipera (talk) Gisla von Verla that would be very difficult as she never existed and is a fictitious person. Hard to believe that someone would actually place this person from that fake family tree here.[reply]