Jump to content

Talk:List of unmanned aerial vehicles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture of the Stardust II (2010)

[edit]

Um. As of this writing it looks like a picture of a rubber band powered balsa wood flier. I don't think Chili is *quite* that poor. Um. So, is wikipedia getting vandalized by an intelligent vandal, did someone screw up, or is that actually an accurate picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.133.78.56 (talk) 06:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
I would like to say the uav under pakistan should be under private beacuse the pakistani govt had no involvment in these uavs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.135.248 (talk) 03:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This list has a number of external links in the two sections at the bottom of the page, and under normal circumstances, some of these could be considered "linkspam". It is the ultimate goal of the UAV project here at Wikipedia to eventually have individual articles for most of these. In the mean time, please indulge those of us who are working on this project by allowing these links to remain in the list. Thanks. Akradecki 03:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The open source Apeliotes project has upgraded and moved to [1] from [2]. Removed old and updated list accordingly.

Teledyne Ryan M-350 UAV

[edit]

I've done some checking while cleaning up the list, and it seems that this one is a hoax, no verifiable refs. I've listed it for AfD, if anyone is interested in putting their oar in the water. Akradecki 18:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snark

[edit]

Another one for someone to write up some time is the diesel UAV helicopter Snark from TGR Helicorp. http://www.tgrhelicorp.com/snark.htm Nurg 09:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Hi, could someone pls make the list being able to sort itself by date of introduction?[reply]

92.62.224.28 (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Ondrej_cs92.62.224.28 (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TAI Anka A 2010 v2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:TAI Anka A 2010 v2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation

[edit]

The title shoulld be capitalised as List of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles or to avoid the proble List of UAVs--Petebutt (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, not really. See WP:TITLE. --Izno (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could someone pls make the list being able to sort itself by date of introduction? 92.62.224.28 (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Ondrej_cs92.62.224.28 (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/falco-uav/
    Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

a notice

[edit]

to United States the same Northrop MQM-74A is repeated three times

how about an addition

[edit]

America: Northrop JB-1 Jet bomb (surface to surface), Northrop JB-10 Buzz bomb (surface to surface), Aeronca GB-1, GB-2, GB-3, GB-4, GB-5, GB-6, GB-7, GB-8, GB-9, GB-10, GB-11, GB-12, GB-13, GB-14 and GB-15 (air to surface), Aeronca GT-1 (air to ship), WFEL JB-4 (surface to surface, air to surface)

Canada: Bombardier CL-89, Bombardier CL-427, Bombardier Puma

Australia: Tempest Vindicator

Bulgaria: Aerotechnics Hawk 2

France: Roy Aerial torpedo first version (air to surface), Roy Aerial torpedo second version (air to surface)

Belgium: Thomson-CSF Epervier

India: DRDO-ISRO AVATAR

United Arab Emirates (UAE): RPS Kestrel Mark II

Ukraine: Rise A-2 Sinitsa, Rise A-3 Remez, Rise A-4K Albatros, Rise A-11 Swift, Rise A-12 Hurricane

Japan: Yokosuka Kugisho MXY4 Type 1 1940, Yokosuka Kugisho MXY7 Type 53 Ohka unmanned (air to surface), Mitsubishi Ki-148 I-Go-1B (air to surface), Kawasaki Ki-147 I-Go-1A (air to surface)

Austria: C. Craft Eyrie Mark VII

Germany: Vergeltungswaffen V-4 (surface to surface, air to surface jet rocket), Vergeltungswaffen (Zeppelin) V-7 (surface to airplane), Ruhrstahl Kramer X-7 (air to tank, also known as Ruhrstahl Kramer 347), Arado Ar E.377 und Ar E.377A (air to ship), Henschel Hs 117 (surface to airplane, air to air), Henschel Hs 293 (air to ship), Henschel Hs 294 (air to ship), Henschel Hs 295 (air to ship), Henschel Hs 298 (air to air), Henschel Hs GT 1200 (air to ship), Henschel Zitterrochen (air to surface), Blohm & Voss BV 143A und BV 143B (air to ship), Blohm & Voss BV 246 (air to surface, also known as Blohm & Voss BV 226), Blohm & Voss BV 950 L10 und BV 950 L11 (air to ship), Luftfahrt Forschungsanstalt Braunschweig Volkenrode LT 9.2 (air to ship), Messerschmitt Enzian E-4 (surface to airplane)

Belarussia: Indels Boom, Indels Berkut

Russia: Transas Watch 2, Transas Watch 3, Transas Watch 4, Transas Watch 5, Transas Watch 100, AFM Servers Ptero CM, Irkut 2M, Irkut 3, Irkut 10, Irkut 200, Irkut 850, Zala Aero 421-05H, Zala Aero 421-09, Zala Aero 421-11, Zala Aero 421-16, Blaskor, Kamov Ka-37, Jablonski Helicopter torpedo 1916, TsIAM GLL-8 GLL-VK, Tupolev Tu-113, Tupolev Tu-121, Tupolev Tu-130, Tupolev Tu-139, Tupolev Tu-243, Tupolev Tu-300, Tupolev Voron, Yakovlev Bumblebee 1, Yakovlev Zhavoronok, Sokol Tribute, Antigrad Avia A-03 Nart, Moscow MAI PS-01 Mosquito, Moscow MAI Elf D, Vega Beam, Vega Aist, Novik XXI century, Aerocon Inspector 101, Aerocon Inspector 201, Aerocon Inspector 301, Aerocon Inspector 402, Aerocon Inspector 601, ENIKS E2M, ENIKS T10E, ENIKS T23E, Nikitin MTR2 1935, Mikoyan Gurevich R-500, MAC Hummingbird, Unmanned systems Superkom S350, Unmanned systems Superkom S250, Unmanned systems Pioneer S100

Greece: https://postimg.cc/kVzg2Yfv Byzantine rocket powered missile circa 1225 AD, https://postimg.cc/xcjns06Q Archytas steam powered pigeon circa 400 BC

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I request you to accept the addition of an Interlink from the word "PSATRI" in Saudi Arabia section to our official Wiki article page - PSATRI (Prince Sultan Advanced Technology Research Institute). This addition will certainly prove helpful for both the articles.

Thank you.

-Official Author of PSATRI Article

Hnhusain (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Italian UAS to be updated

[edit]

Hello everybody, I noted that the list of Italian UAS is not up to date.

First of all let me say that most of systems now belong to the company Leonardo, Airborne&Space Systems division, that incorporated Finmeccanica Selex ES (since 2015), Selex Galileo (since 2013) and former Galileo Avionica and Meteor. This applies to all the aerial targets. Furthermore UAS of mini class are missing, such as Asio-B and Spyball-B VTOLs, Crex-B fixed wing. You can find information on Finmeccanica/Leonardo website. These systems have a military type certification and are delivered to Italian Army. As far as the Hero is concerned, remark that Sistemi Dinamici is part of Leonardo, Helicopter division. Other companies UAS to mention are IDS with its Manta and Colibrì, or the Strix from Alpi Aviation. These information can be found on companies websites, further small UAVs may also be mentioned.

If anybody has time to update the list, thanks in advance. Maurizio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.46.206.134 (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 42 external links on List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on List of unmanned aerial vehicles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with Pakistan section

[edit]

The Pakistan section of this article includes an introductory paragraph that seems to lack the neutrality expected of a wikipedia article and is completely lacking in any citations to support statements like: referring to Pakistans UAV program as "highly active and successful" and "foreign countries who have not been keen to supply UAVs to Pakistan, despite the fact that they would be useful in Pakistan's operations against terrorists". 174.70.135.158 (talk) 06:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your input. I have a first pass attempt at cleaning up the section and removed drones which were sourced from alibaba. You were right that the introduction is not really required since no other country has one and was also POV plus unsourced. Any other help is appreciated since I feel that section needs further cleaning up. Thanks once again. Adamgerber80 (talk) 15:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Section drone from Germany

[edit]

The list contains for German drones the Fieseler Fi 103 "V1" which shouldn't been listed here, because it is not a drone type of aerial vehicle but a cruise missile. Other cruise misses aren't listed here as well. It should be moved to the list of cruise missiles.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieseler_Fi_103 https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.59.186.128 (talk) 17:20, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea section

[edit]

Excuse me... Why you Adamgerber80 are labeling NK News,The Diplomat and Chosun Ilbo(also Yonhap) and other sources simply as "random news", do you object the content or are you uninformed? I fail to see your logic to label informations that are on topic and fullfil/complement each other as it also informs people of state of North Korean UAV's. Your move of reversing under reason "random news" which is your opinion that doesnt recognize significance of several sources sheeding light on the subject.

Might as well remove articles by North Korea Tech and 38 North due to removal of equal caliber such as NK News and The Diplomat to upholad standard you set yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.219.43.96 (talk) 22:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamgerber80:

Noticed your username in edit history, checked talk, no reply to that user. I will restore content. Gwailofeng (talk) 00:43, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gwailofeng: This is per WP:CRYSTALBALL. That is also a possibility but we have no concrete information about it. Secondly, the editor never pinged me, nor have you. Please do not restore content just because of the reason mentioned above. Adamgerber80 (talk) 01:53, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see I made mistake with pinging, atleast you could have admit I attempted, doesnt mere mention of your username pop up alert/notification? Anyway From what I can see a lot of times articles in Wiki often have informations that arent concrete and I get sense of double standard, specialy history related. @Adamgerber80: Gwailofeng (talk) 10:43, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamgerber80: vast majority sources you removed/reverted don't fall under WP:CRYSTALBALL with it content that deals with past, not future. It is very questionable to remove sources such one from 38 North as you removed up to date article and one article from page affiliated with it then removal of Yonhap and Chosun Ilbo, major news outlets in South Korea which covered drone incidents with North Korea. Removal of NK News is very questionable too, are you removing it due to not being able to access the article? You can via twitter hyperlink at their twitter account. Gwailofeng (talk) 10:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Gwailofeng: I am not questioning the sources. Most if not all of them meet WP:RS. I am removing them since we have little information about these possible systems. To the fact that even don't even have their names and they are "believed" to be under development. This falls under WP:CRYSTALBALL since we are theorizing their existence and basing a lot of this on assumptions. Let's wait for more concrete information on them before we add them. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamgerber80: Majority of information you have removed are not of possible, but in fact are actual systems that exist and are not a theory by fact of actual evidencd such as images of them and captured examples. Panghyon 1/2 exist as evident by tourist who by chance managed to take snapshot of it, similar to early Chinese drones. [1] Are you going to claim details evident by captured examples are assumption? Please hold any object, describe it and then tell yourself you are yourself making assumption about the object despite holding it and analyzing it yourself. I read sources and I am seeing how can you assert what you assert for vast majority. You essentialy claim past is future. That is my honest view of your actions. I wont sugarcoat. Remove what doesn't fall under WP:RS yet it you don't restore anything then apply standard to every other UAV section, then remove almost all of it. Gwailofeng (talk) 21:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Gwailofeng: I have explained to you that most names are based on possibilities with no confirmation. We cannot list here that a drone exists with them which is a possible copy of something. That content possible belongs in the NK Armed forces section. Here the list is pretty precise and we should try to keep it that way. Pinging @BilCat: who also has contributed on this page in the past for their views. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/north-koreas-secret-drone-military-10224955.amp

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Regardless of whether they have a reference added, shouldn't all red-linked and non-linked entries be removed per WP:NOTDIR. We don't need an exhaustive list here, but a list of wikipedia articles about unmanned aerial vehicles would still be useful - although how much more useful than a category is questionable. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. First phase completed - removed any text-only entries with no references, or any red-linked entries with no-references. Still a good percentage of the article is referenced plain text (not linking to a Wiki article) or red-linked but with a reference. Should these be the next stage? --10mmsocket (talk) 16:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Split huge lists into separate articles

[edit]

US for instance has a huge list of UAVs for different purposes. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 13:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_unmanned_aerial_vehicles&oldid=1257457114"