This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
Yes, I would definitely either split it in two or maybe make relevant entries under the various railway lines listed. It's a very very long list indeed! Regs, Khani100 (talk) 08:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]
I have removed the {{prod}} tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 12:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose splitting. At the time of the post, the article's style, formatting and layout have been significantly changed and improved, and it makes more sense at this time to keep all of the information in one list article per these changes. Northamerica1000(talk)22:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. As you know, im the one who created this page. And you also know that the list i created had a loooot of trains mentioned.. and now.. only about 10% of them are mentioned.. Please either mention all or remove the rest. Thank you. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.