Talk:List of programmes broadcast by Challenge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of programmes broadcast by Challenge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 June 2014. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

Television: British / Game shows Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Television game shows task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Not a TV guide

I've removed the "Upcoming programming" section from the article because it directly violates our policy on what Wikipedia is not, at WP:NOTTVGUIDE (bullet 4). The guidance says:

For example, an article on a radio station should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable.

This would obviously apply to TV channels such as Challenge, too.

I think the "Status" columns in two of the tables also fall foul of this, but would appreciate hearing other opinions before I remove them as well. —SMALL JIM 18:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone actively object to the removal of these status columns? —SMALL JIM 10:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's been no reply for over a month, despite numerous edits to the article, so I've gone ahead and removed the status columns. Happy to reconsider if anyone can show that they do not violate the policy referred to above. The whole article is in danger of deletion if it can't be properly referenced too. —SMALL JIM 18:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been reviewed:

And its been rubber stamped, so leave it alone. --Crazyseiko (talk) 08:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]