Talk:List of prehistoric bony fish genera

List of prehistoric bony fish genera received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fishes High‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Prehistoric?

I don't understand why the word "prehistoric" is in the title. I'm sure that all species of fish date from prehistoric times. Steve Dufour (talk) 07:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While most higher level taxons (orders, superfamilies) of fish have fossil record very few genera have fossil records and very very very few if any species have fossil records. This is a list of fish genera known only from fossils. --Kevmin (talk) 07:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting back. I was a little confused since where I live, California, prehistoric times went up to about 250 years ago since the native people were not keeping written records. Steve Dufour (talk) 21:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised similar concerns at Talk:List_of_prehistoric_cartilaginous_fish#Article_should_be_moved. I think a more accurate title for these articles would be desirable. -- Yzx (talk) 01:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links to non topic articles

The following links on the page link to pages not related to fish genera. I'd fix this but not sure the best way except for creating the target entries. Zanclus, Umbra, Triodon, Solea, Roncador, Nansenia, Echeneis, Chanda, Brama. Cordyceps (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I have sorted these with links at least to living species. I let an expert build on it!

Someone had beaten me to two of them, thanks. I haven't checked the other 1,380!!!John M Brear (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Structure - alphabetic or taxonomic?

I know, you will all love me for this ;)

I came here in order to identify a fossil I have recently bought. It has no ID or location or... but it is beautiful! Whilst this list is excellent and comprehensive, it might be much more useful if it were structured according to higher taxa. That way someone with my object in view could eliminate possibilities en masse, rather than individually. The present alphabetic order by genus is fine if you know what you are looking for.

A table with columns for each taxonomic level would probably be the best presentation.

I recognize it would be a huge task, even for someone with expert knowledge of the field. An amateur like me would have to follow each link to determine order, family etc. The page Lists of prehistoric fish and its sub-pages do this in part, but link back here for several of the sublists. Between them and this we have the base for something really good.

What do other editors think? .John M Brear (talk) 20:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of prehistoric bony fish genera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723131237/http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=611&rank=class to http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=611&rank=class

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]