Talk:List of minor characters in the Alice series

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Untitled

I've never done this before, but I was trying to figure out which character I was in Alice in Wonderland (as I've identified with the story, but never with Alice) and I finally realized I'm Alice's older sister. I'm going to try and flesh this out, but I agree that this should be added to the list of minor characters as even though I identify with her, she's only mentioned twice. And as an older sister, I don't mind letting the other characters have the glory they deserve. --Melaniejching (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I believe characters such as Eaglet and Duck should be merged due to lack of sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Characters not appearing

The Tortoise is given an entry, though he doesn't appear. Ada and Mabel don't appear, and they're not given entries. Same can be said of the Farmer and his terrier. Perhaps the tortoise section should not be retained. -- Evertype·✆ 15:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe an entry should be added for Ada, Mabel, the Farmer and his terrier. 199.90.157.11 (talk) 15:57, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why this name?

Why is this a list of MINOR characters in the Alice series? There isn't a corresponding page for MAJOR chracters. 199.90.157.11 (talk) 15:57, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of minor characters in the Alice series → Characters of Alice in Wonderland – Per WP:CONCISE - "minor" is not necessary, and the vast majority of people will recognize "Alice in Wonderland" over the "Alice series" (of which there are actually many - see Alice). Links to the major characters should likely be added, even if they have their own sub-articles._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support change from "in the Alice series" to "of Alice in Wonderland" for recognizability. No opinion on whether "minor" should be removed, but if it is, then {{see main}} link sections to characters omitted for not being "minor" should be added above the truly minor characters. BD2412 T 04:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move to List of minor characters in Alice in Wonderland. I agree with the nominator that Alice series should be changed to Alice in Wonderland, but I think minor should be kept in the article title to make it WP:PRECISE on what the article is talking about. Interstellarity (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, the list also includes minor characters from the 1871 sequel, so renaming the page to include just "Alice in Wonderland" would be misinformation. Through the Looking Glass does not take place in Wonderland (dibs on the tee-shirt version). Randy Kryn (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Randy Kryn – Wonderland ≠ Looking-glass world. Further, "minor" should remain as the major ones are not discussed here. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.