Talk:List of locomotive builders

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of locomotive builders article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Trains: Locomotives Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

comment

Please excuse the naivete, but did not Australian State owned railway workshops effectively build their own engines at times? Are we caught up with the issue of where 'company' is a limiting term - because I am sure that in Western Australia the WAGR (Western Australian Government Railways) built engines. Where/how do we list "in-house" construction? I am very interested in how we get around this one.User:SatuSuro 14:59, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why the Australian State Railways shouldn't be included as a locomotive (or other) builder. After all, Wikipedia is full of locos built by British Railways Chevin 17:59, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Seems fine to me, but I'm wondering why Siemens aren't included in the list of Locotive manufacturers.
Probably because nobody's added them to the list yet. slambo 15:51, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added Ipswich workshops, Queensland Railways. Biscuittin (talk) 08:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Number ever built.

Trains magazine had a article estimating the number of locomotives ever built worldwide. It was about, IIRC, 500,000.

Tabletop (talk) 06:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 25 external links on List of locomotive builders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Selection Criteria and Categorization

In this article, should manufacturers only be listed once in the country where their headquarters are located, or should there be a separate entry for each country that the manufacturer builds locomotives in? What is the criteria for listing subsidiaries? What is the proper way to indicate that a manufacturer is now a subsidiary of another manufacturer? Do manufacturers of track machines and DMUs/EMUs qualify for this list? Sorry for my ignorance and the list of questions, and thank you for any replies. HONDAGUY (talk) 02:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of locomotive builders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.heemaf.nl/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pgrail.co.za/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060111190822/http://www.stt-train.se/eng/stt_eng.html to http://www.stt-train.se/eng/stt_eng.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Steam Traction

I do apologize for this, but I feel as though the 5AT Project doesn’t deserve to be on this list. My reasoning is that throughout the project existence, to my knowledge, it never produced a single locomotive. Therefore, by my train of thought (forgive the pun), they don’t classify as a locomotive builder. I wish to put this up for debate and see how people feel on this topic before I or anyone else changed it. If you have an opinion on this, please either write below or on my talk page. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Locomotive 150 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]