Talk:List of largest craters in the Solar System

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:List of largest craters in the Solar System is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Probably best if we restrict this list to bodies to "worlds" in hydrostatic equilibrium or (like Vesta) nearly so. Otherwise it wouldn't be interesting. — kwami (talk) 03:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the lunar crater Korolev?

The Korolev Crater on the far side has a diameter of 437 km. I don't understand why it's not in this list and it makes me wonder what else is missing. DrZygote214 (talk) 00:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

larger crater on Pluto

for anyone who was curious of my claims of a larger crater on Pluto, the latest NH images (released Nov 12 "psychedelic Pluto") show an arc slightly above and to the right of Sputnik Planum. It's difficult to tell its exact size, and it's clearly quite old. Either way, it seems to be the largest confirmed crater on Pluto. exoplanetaryscience (talk) 04:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naming convention

Isn't the Earth's moon called Luna, not "Moon"? Perhaps Terra is also a better name than "Earth". Ignesandros (talk) 04:38 AM, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Mead crater.gif

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ganymede crater

The source given for the "unnamed crater" on Ganymede [1] lists its radius as 7,800 km; its diameter would be 15,600 km, the figure given in this article. Either way, that would make the crater's diameter 3x larger than Ganymede's diameter (at 5,270 km), which is geographically impossible. Other articles on the crater give the same 7,800 km figure, and are probably quoting the above article.--Father Goose (talk) 21:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hellas

What does Largest visible crater in the Solar System mean? Are there known invisible craters? —Tamfang (talk) 22:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering that too, maybe it means largest fully visible/non-obstructed crater in the Solar System? If that's what it's meant to mean, I don't know why they wouldn't just write non-obstructed. Sealpaii (talk) 03:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Ceres listed with (asteroid)?

I thought Ceres was definitely a dwarf planet, writing asteroid while also having objects like Vesta listed is kinda confusing is it not? Sealpaii (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Asteroid, Ceres is both a dwarf planet and an asteroid. I have changed it on this table to be "dwarf planet" along with Pluto, for specificity. -- Beland (talk) 19:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weird ratio math

Calculating the ratio of crater diameter as measured on the surface of a body, to the body diameter as measured through the center of the body, is weird, because the former can be 628% of the latter (2 pi). The linked articles seem to instead use the surface area percentage of the body affected by the crater, which seems more intuitive. I think the ratio column in this table should be replaced with those numbers. -- Beland (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I support doing this, especially since impact basins are often non-circular above the 500 to 1,000 km mark. ArkHyena (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]