Jump to content

Talk:List of islands of the British Isles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Surprisingly poor article?

[edit]

You would think that a list of islands of the British Isles would be a done and dusted topic by now, but there are a number of outstanding problems with this entry. There are over 6000 islands in the British Isles, but the article lists only in the region of 50, and there are in the region of 150 inhabited islands - a lot more than 50. So already by any criteria the article falls far short.

And then the preamble to the list includes this rather confusing general list:

"There are 187 permanently inhabited islands in total: 

   Isle of Man: 2
   Republic of Ireland: 62 and part of Ireland
   United Kingdom: 123 and part of Ireland
       England: 19 and part of Great Britain
       Northern Ireland: 1 and part of Ireland
       Scotland: 97 and part of Great Britain (as of the 2001 census, 4 had only a sole permanent occupant, and further 20 had a permanent population of fewer than 10)
       Wales: 6 and part of Great Britain"

I do not know what the numbers following the colons, and the prepositional clauses following these, relate to. The Isle of Man is one island. The islands near to it number more than two. The Republic of Ireland is a nation-state situated on the island of Ireland, and is not an island. What is the 62? The islands that are part of England are not part of Great Britain, which is an island. Northern Ireland can't add one to the total of inhabited islands, since it is part of an island that I suppose has already been counted when we mentioned the Republic of Ireland.

I suppose we need to ask: can Wikipedia accommodate a list of all the islands of the Isles when there are so many? I would love it to, but I've noticed a dislike among some editors of long lists. If not, we should give up on the idea and delete the article, leaving this knowledge to other parts to the internet to provide, and instead work on a good, clear list of inhabited and partially inhabited islands in the British Isles. Meerta (talk) 00:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portsmouth is an island…. Pretty big one at that 2A02:C7E:363D:9C00:3C50:AFC8:E8B5:1E8 (talk) 14:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus?

[edit]

The latest entries to this discussion are more than 6 months old.

Is there a consensus? Should the "Factual Dispute" flag be removed?

Btw: the style book I (seldom) use suggests "republic of Ireland", small "r", to designate the country (26 counties) and avoid confusinon with the island, or the historical country (both 32 counties). Stephenlegh (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gorumna Island

[edit]

The area of Gorumna Island is 23.8 km2 and can be found on this site (page 11): http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:MKj9xRf03oUJ:www.ub.ntnu.no/formidl/utgivelser/til_opplysning/to_nr16.pdf+tearaght+island+sq.km&hl=no&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=nohttp://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:MKj9xRf03oUJ:www.ub.ntnu.no/formidl/utgivelser/til_opplysning/to_nr16.pdf+tearaght+island+sq.km&hl=no&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=no

Revert battles

[edit]

Bring your disputes here, gentlefolk. GoodDay (talk) 23:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. That is what I have suggested. But some folk seem to prefer edit-warring. Sarah777 (talk) 23:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While some of Bardcom's removals of the term "British Isles" have certainly been justified, removing it from this article seems strange. Agree with Ben/Canterbury - there is nothing about sovereignty in the article, no need to have Ireland bolded. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 00:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He didn't (so far as I know) remove anything from here. I spotted that Ireland (Republic) was included in a table in a manner that suggested it was an entity akin to parts of the UK and pointed out it was fundamentally different being a sovereign state. This seems to be either (1) beyond the grasp of or (2) unpalatable to some editors - especially some Anon. Of course it should be "bolded"; you don't lump counties and countries together in a list. Sarah777 (talk) 00:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A quick look at the history shows he has. Of course the listing should be Ireland; but Scotland, England and Wales aren't counties. There is no need to bold Ireland's entry; or to make personal attacks, for that matter. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 00:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bastun, I merely reverted to Sarah777's earlier version and made the point in the edit history about the correct and legal term of the country. And I left an explanatory (and very civil) comment on the editor's Talk page. I did not remove anything. I did not bold anything. I did not add or delete anything. Just a revert. Bardcom (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eh...come again? Personal attack? Where...exactly? "Mixing counties and countries" is an analogy - a rather apt one at that. And I note you have joined the edit-warring tag-team. That isn't a personal attack btw; a simple observation of fact. Sarah777 (talk) 00:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"This seems to be either (1) beyond the grasp of or (2) unpalatable to some editors..." is ad hominem. On the actual issue, your new version is okay, as in I can live with it - but really, in my opinion, all this emphasis on "Ooh, look, we're soverign, we are!" just reads to me like Ireland has a point to prove - I thought we'd well outgrown the inferiority complexes of the past? :P BastunBaStun not BaTsun 09:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re the "inferiority complex" -I never was a great fan of psychobabble. If British editors were not trying to "prove a point" by calling Ireland a "British" isle then the table (before I fixed it) might not look so bad. An uninformed reader (apparently the vast majority of Wiki-readers) could be under the impression that Ireland was part of the UK combining the misleading article title with the undifferentiated layout. Sarah777 (talk) 19:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MacRusgail - care to join the rest of us in discussion before reverting? BastunBaStun not BaTsun 15:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about there is a disclaimer in parentheses next to the article link through to British Isles such as "(see article for naming dispute)". I personally don't like the term as it suggests either Ireland is part of Britain or controlled by Britain. It isn't and has never been part of Britain and only one sixth remains partly controlled by it. I like to promote the term "Celtic Isles" as it covers more countries and reflects truer the history of these isles peoples. <joke>Since British derives from a meaning of Celtic, perhaps the English will be easier to persuade than thought.</joke> Steve hill4 (talk) 18:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection notice

[edit]

I've put a three day protection on this article. Please use the time to resolve disputes here amicably, it's such an obscure article and really shouldn't be producing so much heat. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I simply can't understand why a minor edit to clarify a point should generate so much opposition! When that happens I always suspect an agenda. Oh and btw - you have, of course, protected the wrong version. How do ye Admins manage to do that all the time? Sarah777 (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Working this out

[edit]

OK, let's see if we can work this out? Does anyone disagree with the following three sentences:

  • 1) There is an archipelago off the coast of north-western Europe
  • 2) An article listing the islands in this archipelago is legitimate
  • 3) In the English language this archipelago is most commonly referred to as "the British Isles"

What about these:

  • 1) There is an island in this archipelago called in the English language "Ireland"
  • 2) There is a state on that island called officially just "Ireland", but commonly in English called "Republic of Ireland" to distinguish it from the island in general
  • 3) The province of Northern Ireland, not part of [Republic of] Ireland, is part of the island of Ireland
  • 4) Confusion is best avoided

Anyone? I gotta say I don't think this matter should be busying anyone's time. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 19:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be sure, these disputes are educational & entertaining. GoodDay (talk) 21:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deek - I search your bullet points for a suggestion but I don't see none. I agree that "Confusion is best avoided". It's a kinda mantra with me. Sarah777 (talk) 23:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, the suggestions will come. I'm giving Socratic method a try. ;) Do you agree with all? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 00:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, No, Depends. No, Depends, No, No. Bardcom (talk) 00:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lol ... surely if there is no archipelago [I must be sitting on water just now!], it can't have any names. Unless British Isles is a fictional place like Narnia or something. ;) Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 00:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hang on - your asked if I disagree with the statements. Confused yet? (Are you sitting in water? :-) And you know - sometimes I really do believe that the British Isles is a fictional place - so I'm agreeing with that too :-) Bardcom (talk) 00:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Good. You paid attention, I didn't. 3) should be simple. I think we both know that British Isles is by far the most common was to refer to the archipelago in English. That aside, we have no problem with use of the term here? Just checking. Next part. Why do you have a problem with the term "Republic of Ireland", and insist on "Ireland" when Northern Ireland is also being used? Surely the availability of the term "Republic of Ireland" is convenient in this context for disambiguation. No? Would you support getting rid of all references to both Northern and Republic (in the table) and replace with Ireland? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 00:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - do I get a gold star then! 3) should be simple, but given that the language used in your test assertions is very generalised, let's agree that for *this* article it is appropriate. For the last part, in my mind it's very simple and many discussions have been had on this topic before. We use "Republic of Ireland" where we need to disambiguate the state from "Northern Ireland". Given that it's clear from the article that one column is for the name of the island, and the other column is for the name of the country, then it's clear that there is no need for using a term reserved for disambiguation. Recently, the use of the term has gotten out of hand, with many people using the ROI term all the time when referring to Ireland. Is there an agenda on Wikipedia to rename the state? This is not wikipedia's role. I believe that incorrect use of the term only serves to confuse people as it implies that the name of the state is actually "Republic of Ireland", which it isn't. It doesn't help that the article on the state is called "Republic of Ireland" - it's factually incorrect, and causes more problems that it solves. --Bardcom (talk) 09:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(unindent) Well, presumably we can all agree to include (a form of) the disambiguation sentence at the top of the article, re Ireland being a sovereign state and the other entities being constituent countries of the United Kingdom? If so - could we agree on amending that sentence so that it also clearly informs the reader that Ireland is the official name of a state on the island as well as the island and that state is described as RoI, yada yada. Will try to draft something in a bit to show ye what I mean if its not clear... BastunBaStun not BaTsun 09:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds better - although it reminds me of an earlier discussion where someone suggested using a disambiguation of "Ireland (island)" and "Ireland (state)", which to me is a better and more appropriate disambiguation, and gets rid of the idea that somehow the term "Republic of Ireland" is the name of the state. Bardcom (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't that you who made the proposal? :P Anyway, how's this?
Nope, wasn't me... --Bardcom (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was my proposal: 'Ireland (island)' & 'Ireland (state)'; at least I think it was me. GoodDay (talk) 14:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"This page is a list of the larger islands that comprise the British Isles by area. The Faroe Islands are not included. Note that Ireland, which uses the official description "Republic of Ireland", is a sovereign state comprising 26 of the 32 counties on the island of Ireland. The remaining six comprise Northern Ireland. Where Ireland is used in the list below, it relates to the state. The other countries mentioned are constituent countries of the United Kingdom."
A bit longer than I'd wanted, but I think it gets everything across. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 11:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For me, I think that's good - minor changes below. I think the column names should change as well to say "Island Name" and "Country Name" --Bardcom (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"This page is a list of the larger islands that comprise the British Isles by area. The Faroe Islands are not included. Note that Ireland, which uses the official description "Republic of Ireland", is a sovereign state comprising 26 of the 32 counties on the island of Ireland. The remaining six counties comprise Northern Ireland. Where Ireland is used in the country column below, it relates to the state. The other countries mentioned are constituent countries of the United Kingdom."
Works for me. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 13:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's a need for any further explanation in the article. The meaning is clear and concise, so I vote to leave it as it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silas Stoat (talk • contribs) 18:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. Not even close here guys. Firstly, the use of the term "British Isles" IS a problem, as it is an offensive term to Irish people. Secondly, setting that aside, the constituent "parts" (NI isn't a "country") of the UK cannot simply be listed along with Ireland as it they were political equivalents. Thirdly, the suggested text is nonsense; - Note that Ireland, which uses the official description "Republic of Ireland" - this is bull. We are using names of places here - not "descriptions", official or otherwise. Sarah777 (talk) 21:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about just going the rugby way and listing by nation, i.e England Scotland Wales and Ireland, i.e. by nation rather than state? The British Isles thing ... offensive or not, it is established English usage, and not the only term in the language to have irritating connotations. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 21:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
However controversial, as a geographic location, an article like this is valid. But the column "country" is causing problems. Why don't we just drop it, thereby ridding the article of political influences and returning the article to a geographic-only state. --Bardcom (talk) 21:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sarah, sorry, the term is widely used in the English-speaking world, and not including because some people object, in an article with this title, would be just silly. In my opinion. Bardcom - the Gordian Knot solution! I like! BastunBaStun not BaTsun 21:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Again, ya'll can put in the article content, whatever ya'll want. Just don't omit the term British Isles. GoodDay (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion kinda petered out. The last thing discussed was removing the final column. --Bardcom (talk) 16:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support that, as well as restoring the text we had in the intro, pre protection. (One is not conditional on the other, though!) BastunBaStun not BaTsun 14:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Watching like a hawk here. Removing the final column is a good idea and would remove the equivalence issue that I object to. Support removing the final column - and moving on. Sarah777 (talk) 22:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at it again - removing the country column also removes the need for restoring the lead text - what's there now is fine. I went to be bold and remove the country column - and got faced with complicated wiki markup. Will leave it till I'm more awake, unless someone beats me to it. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 22:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merged?????

[edit]

I see "List by Pop" has been merged with "List" - I think. I guess one less article with "British Isles" in the title is a victory for progress. Sarah777 (talk) 15:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well, since the advent of "wikitable sortable", it has become pointless to keep separate lists "sorted by $ITEM". You can just click on the column header to sort by anything you like. dab (𒁳) 15:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Country and island

[edit]

It is of course particularly important in this article to distinguish between the Republic of Ireland and the island of Ireland. As the Manual of Style states, "A large number of Republic of Ireland towns and villages (and other types of articles too) state that they are in Ireland, not Republic of Ireland in the opening paragraph. This is misleading as it creates the impression that the island of Ireland is one state." While it goes on to mention a possible compromise of piping the link in articles on towns and villages in the Republic, it's not appropriate here as it is downright confusing. Warofdreams talk 09:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can change it back to appearing as Republic of Ireland if you want. I must admit, it does look confusing (think of how it would look to a person non-familiar with Ireland). GoodDay (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Channel Islands

[edit]

Why are the channel islands discussed in this article as being part of the British Isles (being the geographical area, not the historical geo-political area). I propose to remove these references. --Bardcom (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bardcom; you need to read the back issues! There was a major kerfuffle about this exact point 6 months ago and what you might call the 'consensus' decided the CIs were part of the BIs. The same consensus that disallows any name for the islands we live on except "British". (That was my point on the difference between GB&I and what Wiki calls the "British Isles"). Alas, that race is run for now. Sarah777 (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sarah, if you get a chance, can you point me to the previous debate please? Was it on this article or a different article? I don't see any archive pages for this article... --Bardcom (talk) 21:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No - not here. It was on the British Isles article talkpage. In the archives by now - I'd guess about last January. The question was were the CIs part of the BIs or not? The reasons given for inclusion were a bit iffy IMHO but the big numbers won the day. But it did establish that BI wasn't purely a geographical term. Sarah777 (talk) 21:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sarah. Found them in Archive 12 of the British Isles Talk page here. I can't see a consensus to include them given that a consensus has formed that the term is a geographic term. I see lots to suggest that they are included when referring to culture or history, but this is a old-fashioned use of the term. If, on the other hand, the term "British Isles" is not a geographical term, but a political term, then let's acknowledge it up front. If there's an elephant in the room, let's just point it out. --Bardcom (talk) 23:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) Same Proposal. Why are the channel islands discussed in this article as being part of the British Isles (being the geographical area, not the historical geo-political area). I propose to remove these references.

Support since Channel Islands are not part of the geographical area of British Isles. --Bardcom (talk) 23:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I think you have it right when you say it's an old-fashioned use of the term. Chris55 (talk) 15:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - going purely on geography, if Jersey is part of the CIs, then Chausey would be "British".

I also support this. It makes no sense to have a politically defined pseudo-geographic entity.— Blue-Haired Lawyer t 15:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy

[edit]

I've added a disputed tag. Nothing to do with the old naming issues, just the quality of the data. It looks like a jumble of several datasets, none complete.

Off the top of my head, Rathlin Island; three of the Aran islands - Inishmore, Inishmaan, Inisheer; Lambay Island, Arranmore and doubtless others. I thought the Blaskets were, but apparently not since 1953. --MacRusgail (talk) 20:59, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No need to rely on the top of your head; the link lists all the inhabited offshore ROI islands including those you mention (Inishmore is already on the page). My concern is identifying the connected islands.
I understand that this list was formed by merging a population-based list and an area-based list. That's fine, but the criteria for inclusion on the list needs to be specified (e.g. "this includes the fifty largest islands in area and all inhabited islands") and references need to be produced to prove the list is complete within whatever criteria are specified. List of islands of Scotland#Larger islands is a pretty good model of how this page should look, though even that appears to have some original reasearch for calculating the areas. jnestorius(talk) 21:35, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since we set up Wikipedia:WikiProject Scottish Islands, the Scottish island articles have vastly improved, and I can see that the Irish island articles are lagging, in stuff like infoboxes, size/population and various other information. Perhaps this should be taken over to wikiproject Ireland.--MacRusgail (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portsea is an island. There are plenty of sources for this. It's also the third highest populated after the two mainlands. DaveHolden101 (talk) 14:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Area: double counts?

[edit]

The list and the article Geography of Ireland states that the area of Ireland is 84412 sq.km., and elsewhere Wikipedia says the area of Republic of Ireland is 70273 sq. km and of the Northern Ireland 14 139 sq. km. When combined, they make exactly 84412 sq. km. However, some islands, like Achill Island are listed here separately: does it mean their area is included already in the area of Ireland? Are they counted twice? If so, a reader should be warned. Can anybody check what is the area of the island of Ireland WITHOUT smaller island? A curious reader from abroad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.77.103.56 (talk) 15:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the whole count please

[edit]

http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/features/articles/uk6.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 09:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rathlin

[edit]

Sorry if I have missed something in the Talk page or in previous edits, but is Rathlin Island missing from this list? I came on here to see where it ranked size-wise, and am thinking it must be larger than the likes of Bardsey, etc? Its main Wikipedia article suggests it is around 4 miles by 2 miles.

Blackrock78 (talk) 19:34, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Its acreage is said to be 3388 which equates to 5.29 sq miles so clearly it should be on the list . in fact i came here to make the same comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:FB8D:4B01:E13F:6F56:302E:61DE (talk) 23:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland???

[edit]

5 islands inhabited off Ireland? There are at least 20, Valentia, Rathlin, Sherkin, Cape Clear, Inis Beag, Inishmaan, Great Island, Clare Island. All not listed!

Great Island should certainly be listed. The town of Cobh is there, with a population of about 17,000. Does anyone have area and population figures to help complete the table? --Wavehunter (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure Lambay Island is permanently inhabited, too. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are 63 inhabited Irish islands, six of which have only a single inhabitant. 62 are in the Republic and 1 in the North. Lambay is inhabited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leanseahy (talk • contribs) 18:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on List of islands of the British Isles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of islands of the British Isles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Isle missing

[edit]

Why is Fair Isle not listed? It appears to have a permanent population of 55 and an area of about 7.6 sq km, both larger than some other islands that are listed.

More generally, are there particular criteria for which islands are included or omitted? Is the goal that this list should eventually include all 187 (?) of the permanently inhabited islands?

73.203.27.222 (talk) 02:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland again

[edit]

What modern (say post year 2000) authorities of national or international significance, other than British ones, are relied upon for including the island on which the Republic of Ireland is predominantly situated as one of the British Isles? Republic of Ireland organisations certainly don't include it, and I think the UN also avoids including it. dinghy (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got a citation for that? I mean, Google isn't hard to use (though admittedly they make finding their accurate search settings harder these days). Some Irish sources. Some U.S. government sources. Some sources allowed to use the .int top-level domain (there aren't many), here. All limited to within the past year. The term is a common geographical one, despite what you may have read on Reddit or on Talk:British Isles. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The term is an archaic politically loaded geographical one, as is well documented with the earliest known use of the phrase Brytish Iles in the English language dated to 1577 in a work by John Dee who advocated for the colonisation of Ireland
That some uninformed people may still use a term which has no official standing and has no more relevance to Ireland than the term British East Africa as shown in "google" searches is utterly irrelevant to the fact that the term now belongs in the dustbin of history 31.187.2.87 (talk) 11:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should make a move to rename the Irish Sea article, a source of constant offence to the people of Cumbria. Cnbrb (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_islands_of_the_British_Isles&oldid=1233749526"