Jump to content

Talk:List of individual bears

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Great?

[edit]

Can someone who knows better clear up a point under sectn, The Great Bear of Burtonport – which part is tongue-in-cheek/real etc because it's not referenced and needs to be encyclopedic in tone. Don't know enough about it to sort out the irony. Thanks, Julia Rossi (talk) 07:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of this article

[edit]

Amusingly, this article was created far before 2006, but deleted and some of that information put into categories. You won't find this in the history of this article, because it's 'new'. I guess all good things come back around :)
~ender 2008-12-20 11:20:AM MST —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.240.27.73 (talk)

Order?

[edit]

Should this "list" be sorted alphabetically or chronologically? It really should be one or the other, I think. Right now there doesn't seem to be any particular order to it. - dcljr (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it was originally intended to be alphabetical, rather than chronological. I'll edit it accordingly. María (habla conmigo) 12:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Smokey the Bear

[edit]

I can't believe he wasn't mentioned. (Yes, he really did exist. LOL) Raphael (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think "the real" Smokey is discussed here , if anyone wants to check . This bear reportedly was kept on display at the (US) National Zoo in Washington, DC from 1950 to 1976 , and became so popular he even had his own postal zip code .
Since Aug 2011 , he has been listed as "Hotfoot" in this article , although his original name was "Hotfoot Teddy" on the Smokey Bear page . But , shouldn't the title of his entry here begin with "Smokey" , perhaps
Smokey (aka Hotfoot Teddy) , or just Smokey
because Smokey is the name he was known by for 25 years ?
Last , is it better for this article to link (as I did above) to the interior of the Smokey Bear article , or to the top of it ?
70.106.152.64 (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC) mgt220 a yahoo,com[reply]

Rename proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per unanimous consensus here. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:52, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


List of non-fictional bearsList of individual bears – This is an article title only Wikipedia would produce. I think it is enough that we have a hatnonte pointing to List of fictional bears instead of making that distinction right in the article title. It seems to me that just "list of bears" is sufficient. Thoughts? Beeblebrox (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That won't work since List of bears is an exiting article about different types of bears (ie Black bears, Brown bears).--174.93.171.10 (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Crap. "List of notable bears" then? Beeblebrox (talk) 23:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That works for me. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

I made some big changes, wondered if anyone had any thoughts (15 Aug 2014)

[edit]

I was dissatisfied with the page as it was, so I made some rather large changes

  • Reorganized into categories. This way, each bear is not a whole section and the subject matter is grouped meaningfully
  • Eliminated unnecessary words to improve readability
  • Eliminated extraneous information; after all this is a list and probably does not need more than a few sentences on each item
  • Added a few pictures. The page was was looking a little bear.

I apologize for the unbearable pun. The list still needs a deal of work, if anyone is feeling inspired. Piboy51 (talk) 23:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the page looked pretty good when I happened upon it a while back. Thanks for your work on it!
I've been working as time permits to get it fixed up a little, add some more notable bears (it seemed to be heavy on recent bears and left out a few of the historical famous bears) and make some individual pages for bears that don't already have them.
Also made a section for "wrestling bears" as it seems they were rather a thing for a couple decades until most of the US states outlawed them. The amount of information out there on Victor the Wrestling Bear is truly astounding, as is the number of famous people who wrestled with him. I made it "wrestlers and performers" in case I should run across some circus bear who was notable. Haven't yet, but it could happen. TheBlinkster (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of individual bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of individual bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]