Talk:List of individual bears

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of individual bears article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo

Great?

Can someone who knows better clear up a point under sectn, The Great Bear of Burtonport – which part is tongue-in-cheek/real etc because it's not referenced and needs to be encyclopedic in tone. Don't know enough about it to sort out the irony. Thanks, Julia Rossi (talk) 07:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of this article

Amusingly, this article was created far before 2006, but deleted and some of that information put into categories. You won't find this in the history of this article, because it's 'new'. I guess all good things come back around :)
~ender 2008-12-20 11:20:AM MST —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.240.27.73 (talk)

Order?

Should this "list" be sorted alphabetically or chronologically? It really should be one or the other, I think. Right now there doesn't seem to be any particular order to it. - dcljr (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it was originally intended to be alphabetical, rather than chronological. I'll edit it accordingly. María (habla conmigo) 12:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Smokey the Bear

I can't believe he wasn't mentioned. (Yes, he really did exist. LOL) Raphael (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think "the real" Smokey is discussed here , if anyone wants to check . This bear reportedly was kept on display at the (US) National Zoo in Washington, DC from 1950 to 1976 , and became so popular he even had his own postal zip code .

Since Aug 2011 , he has been listed as "Hotfoot" in this article , although his original name was "Hotfoot Teddy" on the Smokey Bear page . But , shouldn't the title of his entry here begin with "Smokey" , perhaps

Smokey (aka Hotfoot Teddy) , or just Smokey

because Smokey is the name he was known by for 25 years ?

Last , is it better for this article to link (as I did above) to the interior of the Smokey Bear article , or to the top of it ?

70.106.152.64 (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC) mgt220 a yahoo,com[reply]

Rename proposal

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per unanimous consensus here. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:52, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of non-fictional bears → List of individual bears – This is an article title only Wikipedia would produce. I think it is enough that we have a hatnonte pointing to List of fictional bears instead of making that distinction right in the article title. It seems to me that just "list of bears" is sufficient. Thoughts? Beeblebrox (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That won't work since List of bears is an exiting article about different types of bears (ie Black bears, Brown bears).--174.93.171.10 (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crap. "List of notable bears" then? Beeblebrox (talk) 23:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to List of individual bears like how other animals are done -- 70.24.250.26 (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support renaming as List of individual bears per IP 70.24. "notable" seems oddly redundant, since obviously the bears would not be mentioned were they not notable. Examples include List of individual dogs, List of individual elephants, List of individual apes, and others. Note that there is a separate list for fictional dogs, not included in the individual dogs list. So perhaps the ursine should follow the canine model? María (yllo submarine) 18:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support renaming as List of individual bears for reasons already given by others above. Don Lammers (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

I made some big changes, wondered if anyone had any thoughts (15 Aug 2014)

I was dissatisfied with the page as it was, so I made some rather large changes

Reorganized into categories. This way, each bear is not a whole section and the subject matter is grouped meaningfully
Eliminated unnecessary words to improve readability
Eliminated extraneous information; after all this is a list and probably does not need more than a few sentences on each item
Added a few pictures. The page was was looking a little bear.

I apologize for the unbearable pun. The list still needs a deal of work, if anyone is feeling inspired. Piboy51 (talk) 23:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the page looked pretty good when I happened upon it a while back. Thanks for your work on it!

I've been working as time permits to get it fixed up a little, add some more notable bears (it seemed to be heavy on recent bears and left out a few of the historical famous bears) and make some individual pages for bears that don't already have them.

Also made a section for "wrestling bears" as it seems they were rather a thing for a couple decades until most of the US states outlawed them. The amount of information out there on Victor the Wrestling Bear is truly astounding, as is the number of famous people who wrestled with him. I made it "wrestlers and performers" in case I should run across some circus bear who was notable. Haven't yet, but it could happen. TheBlinkster (talk) 04:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of individual bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of individual bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016062544/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2013/01/game-of-thrones-casts-a-bear-and-shoots-in-los-angeles-for-major-season-3-scene.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2013/01/game-of-thrones-casts-a-bear-and-shoots-in-los-angeles-for-major-season-3-scene.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]