Talk:List of hills of Devon

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains

@Bermicourt: Nice work on the new pages, but I've moved this one back here: I think your first decision was better. With only two points slightly higher than one accepted definition of "mountain" (above 2,000 feet), the previous title would give the wrong impression to readers unfamiliar with the county that it is "mountainous". As can be seen from the photos, High Willhays and Yes Tor are very far from what the average man would think of as mountains. A minor rewording in the article would clarify this. What do you think? —SMALL JIM 10:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to worry about it. I moved it because it seemed odd to start a list of hills with two recognised mountains so I used the same convention as I did for German states, some of which have mountains and hills and some just have hills. So feel free to adjust the words to fit the title. It's still a work in progress so I'll be adding more hills to the table in due course. Cheers. --Bermicourt (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Exmoor

Just at a casual glance, some parts of Devonian Exmoor are higher than the lower Dartmoor hills. Five Burrows Hill (on OS, but surely Five Barrows Hill) is 493 m. Fremsley (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Five Barrows Hill is already listed. --Bermicourt (talk) 08:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of hills of Devon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]