Jump to content

Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 9

new lists/pages

could we start new lists or pages for most expensive animated film and biggest animted bombs. like Most Expensive Film & Box office bomb? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.93.78 (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Most Expensive animated Film mock list

Most expensive animated films
Rank Title Year Cost (est.)
(millions)
Refs & notes
1 Tangled 2010 $260 [1][2][3][4]
2 Toy Story 3 2010 $200 [5][6]
Cars 2 2011 $200 [7][8][9]
Monsters University 2013 $200 [10]
5 Brave 2012 *$185 [11]
6 WALL-E 2008 $180 [12][13]
7 Monsters vs. Aliens 2009 $175 [14][15][16]
Up 2009 $175 [17][18]
A Christmas Carol 2009 $175 [19][20]
Inside Out 2015 $175 [21][22]
11 How to Train Your Dragon 2010 $165 [23][24][25]
Wreck-It Ralph 2012 $165 [26][27]
Big Hero 6 2014 $165 [28][29]
14 The Polar Express 2004 $160 [30][31]
Shrek the Third 2007 $160 [32]
16 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
17 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
18 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
19 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
20 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
21 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
22 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
23 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
24 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
25 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
26 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
27 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
28 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
29 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
30 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
31 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
32 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
33 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
34 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
35 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
36 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
37 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
38 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
39 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
40 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
41 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
42 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
43 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
44 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
45 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
46 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
47 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
48 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
49 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA
50 'TBA TBA $TBA TBA

* Officially acknowledged figure.

References

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Chmielewski & Eller (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference Corliss (2010b) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference Frankel (2010b) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference Fritz (2010d) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference Corliss (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ Cite error: The named reference Lovell (2010) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference Smith (2011-6-20) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Cite error: The named reference Fritz (2011-6-27) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ Cite error: The named reference Graser (2011-6-24) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  10. ^ Cite error: The named reference FilmLA (2013) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  11. ^ Smith, Grady (23 June 2013). "Box office report: 'Monsters University' scares up $82 million, 'World War Z' shatters expectations". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
  12. ^ Cite error: The named reference Onstad (2008) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ Cite error: The named reference Verrier (2008) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ Barnes, Brooks (10 January 2010). "Taking Aim at the Big Names in Animated Film". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  15. ^ Verrier, Richard (30 March 2009). "'Monsters vs. Aliens' is a hit in three dimensions". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  16. ^ LaPorte, Nicole (24 March 2009). "'Monsters' Has More to Fear Than Aliens". The Wrap. Retrieved 18 May 2010.
  17. ^ Barnes, Brooks (5 April 2009). "Pixar's Art Leaves Profit Watchers Edgy". The New York Times. Retrieved 27 December 2009.
  18. ^ Wloszczyna, Susan (25 May 2009). "Pixar moves on 'Up' with its 10th movie". USA Today. Retrieved 27 December 2009.
  19. ^ Barnes, Brooks (25 October 2009). "Disney Hopes 'Christmas Carol' Lives Up to Its Blockbuster Marketing". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 December 2009.
  20. ^ "Disney studio executive Mark Zoradi resigns". USA Today. Associated Press. 9 November 2009. Retrieved 28 December 2009.
  21. ^ Lang, Brent (17 June 2015). "Box Office: 'Inside Out' Won't Stop 'Jurassic World' Rampage". Variety. Retrieved 4 August 2015.
  22. ^ Cunningham, Todd (20 June 2015). "'Inside Out' Rocks 'Jurassic World' with $34 Million Friday at Box Office". The Wrap. Retrieved 4 August 2015.
  23. ^ Horn, John (14 March 2010). "'How to Train Your Dragon' and a baptism of fire". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 10 September 2010. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
  24. ^ Stewart, Andrew (28 March 2010). "'Dragon' flies to top of box office". Variety. Retrieved 10 September 2010.
  25. ^ Frankel, Daniel (25 March 2010). "Friday Box Office: Drag Opening for 'Dragon'". The Wrap. Retrieved 10 September 2010.
  26. ^ Corliss, Richard (4 November 2012). "'Wreck-It Ralph' Is Rex and 'Flight' Has Great Liftoff on a Busy Post-Storm Weekend". Time. Retrieved 7 December 2012.
  27. ^ Stewart, Andrew (4 November 2012). "Box Office: 'Wreck-It Ralph' smashes record". Variety. Retrieved 9 December 2012.
  28. ^ Cite error: The named reference McNary (2014-11-7) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  29. ^ Cite error: The named reference Hamedy (2014-11-9) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  30. ^ Cite error: The named reference Lippman (2004-10-1) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  31. ^ Cite error: The named reference Kehr (2004-10-24) was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  32. ^ Bloomberg News (17 July 2007). "Fifth 'Shrek' may be the last". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 5 January 2010.

Biggest box office bombs for a animated film mock list

Biggest box office bombs
Rank Title Production budget Worldwide gross Estimated losses [according to whom?] Year Ref
1 Mars Needs Moms $150,000,000 $38,992,758 $130,503,621 2011 [# 1]
2 Treasure Planet $140,000,000 $109,578,115 $85,210,943 2002 [# 2]
3 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
4 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
3 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
4 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
5 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
6 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
7 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
8 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
9 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
10 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
11 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
12 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
13 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
14 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
15 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
16 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
17 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
18 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
19 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
20 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
21 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
22 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
23 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
24 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
25 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
26 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
27 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
10 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
11 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
28 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
29 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
30 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
31 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
32 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
33 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
34 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
35 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
36 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
37 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
38 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
39 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
40 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
41 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
42 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
43 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
44 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
45 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
46 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
47 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
48 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
49 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
50 'TBA TBA align="right"TBA TBA TBA style="text-align:center;"TBA
Tangled is the most expensive? I wouldn't have guessed. This has no place on this page as this page deals with Highest-grossing films, but you can submit a draft to create a page like this, but make sure you have all your data before you do so. DCF94 (talk) 16:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

frist page

here the frist pageMost Expensive animated Film. can u help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

I will try. DCF94 (talk) 03:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Is there any more films. or cane I start working on text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

dragon ball gross

I tracking down the dragon ball gross (dose any else know any more?)

Highest-grossing animated franchises and film series[§] (The films in each franchise can be viewed by selecting "show")
Rank Series Total worldwide box office No. of films Average of films Highest-grossing film

Corpse (March 29, 2013). "Dragon Ball Box-Office History". World of KJ. Retrieved November 25, 2015.

I don't remember right now where, but I know I found box office figures for the first DB films, except for the '96 one, the total, without the '96 and with Resurrection 'F', was at about $270 million. If Toei Animation decides to make another film, it may get on the list, it depends if & when they decide to release it because there are many new franchises/film series coming out in the next couple of years. DCF94 (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
I have sent a message to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_films#dragon_ball for help
I will search for those figures tomorrow if you want, but as I remember, the '96 film can't have more than $12-$15m judging by the progression of the other films, in any case it doesn't pass Rugrats' $299m. DCF94 (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Please do if you get the time also if you already got some of them can you put it the franchise box above.

I actually found a source for all films that puts the series in the top 20. DCF94 (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Spongebob movies

Both Spongebob movies are mostly 2D traditional animated films with some live-action scenes. They are definitely not similar to The Smurfs or Alvin & the Chipmunks or Who Framed Roger Rabbit. If spongebob movies are live-action/animation hybrid then please put The Lego Movie on that list too. Paleocemoski 16:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

reed this https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_animated_films/Archive_3#highest_grossing_live_action_-_animated_films_page we had a long talk about spongebob 2 no.1 can be on this list not no. 2 majority of sponge out of water is live action too much. lego only had a couple of live action scenes. even roger had a copule of completely animted scenes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 17:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Majority of Sponge out of water is not live-action. If you came to this result, just by watching the trailers then please watch the movie. Only the one-fifth of the movie is live-action. Paleocemoski 17:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Even the sponge out of water page says it live action-animated note the live action as well as many other sites A113 animtion, http://m.imdb.com/title/tt2279373/ IMDB, [http://www.slashfilm.com/live-action-spongebob-squarepants-movie/ Slash films — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 23:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
True, the movie have mixes live-action and trditional animation but it's not a hybrid movie. Like I said before, did you even watched the movie, please answer me. Paleocemoski 13:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Can u stop it a hybrid end of story we do not have films like Garfield orSpace Jam,. Why? Because they are hybrids — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talkcontribs) 14:54, 28 November 2015‎ (UTC)

YES! We've been through this with Roger Rabbit, Garfield, Space Jam, SpongeBob. Just because you have different opinion, doesn't change the fact that on this Talk Page there were numerous discussions about those subjects, unfortunately somebody deleted those over time but you can still find them by clicking pn "View history". Tell you what, someone attempted before to create a live-action/animation hybrid page, but he failed. If you feel so strongly about hybrits films, you try and create another draft for "List of highest-grossing live-action/animated films", but you have to manage to bring strong points of why there should be a page like that, cause that's why the last attempt has failed. This page is for animated films only, and if & when we get into a uncertainty of whether a film has it's place or not on this page, we discuss it first on the talk page and not create a mess. DCF94 (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

If u want a Highest grossing hybrid films come over & help out — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 23:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Spongebob movies are not similar to hybrid movies, majority of both SB movies are 2D animation; both characters and enviroment. Paleocemoski 23:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

It isn't really about if the film is X% animated and X% live action, it is about how it is preceded, we work with sources, and sometimes the sources don't give us the information we need, take [1] for example, we know Titanic had a $300+ on its 2012 re-realse but because the source didn't took the re-realse into consideration we can't add it because we don't have the info that Guinness used to creat that top 10. From this first couple of sources that I found [2][3] it is considered half animated and half live action, evan if it is 80% animated, the sources specifies that traditional animation appears in the "underwater scenes" and in the "live action world" the main characters are brough out as CGI animation with the rest of the scenes being live action (people & locations), this is more or less like Space Jam. DCF94 (talk) 12:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Re release question

If some movies are being released, how come the grosses don't go higher. Like for example, why isn't Fantasia's gross climbing higher? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.58.55 (talk) 13:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 1 December 2015

Hello - the link to the movie Inside Out is ambiguous - the link should be piped to Inside Out (2015 film).

Thanks very much!

PKT(alk) 18:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@PKT: sorry no one attended to this request. The article is no longer protected. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Message received, and change made. Thank you, Martin! PKT(alk) 14:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Ruling

I see we going by the rule

An animated feature film is defined as a motion picture with a running time of more than 40 minutes, in which movement and characters’ performances are created using a frame-by-frame technique. Motion capture by itself is not an animation technique. In addition, a significant number of the major characters must be animated, and animation must figure in no less than 75 percent of the picture’s running time.

—Rule Seven - Special Rules For The Animated Feature Film Award : I. Definition

Aloeing SOpgbe Bob 2 on this page?

Is there any other films that qualifies now under this rule that did not before like roger, space jam, etc?

We have to check those before we do anything, but I don't think there are any other films that can make it on a list. DCF94 (talk) 20:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Space Jam and Who Framed Roger Rabbit are similar to The Smurfs or Alvin & the Chipmunks. They take place at mostly live-action enviroments but with 2D characters. According to Rule Seven, they are not animated movies, both movies are animation/live-action hybrids. Paleocemoski 00:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Qustion

Can't cars & planes cout as a film series aswell like how Highest-grossing franchises and film series got Iron man & MCU, Avengers & MCU?

Like



Just wondering? (If not why?)

This will also gives us 25 franchise (the other 21:dragon ball $344.6 million 22: the jungle book $341.5 million 23: Bambi $302.4 millon 24:rugrats $299.6 millon 25:Wallace & Gromit $298.4 millon)

The Planes films are part of the Cars franchise, unlike Iron Man and Avengers who are part of the cinematic universe of MCU but also they are legally their own separate franchise. DCF94 (talk) 17:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Classification

The first section of the article has 5 sub-sections and there are few problems with them.

  • 4 of them are animation techniques and the other one is anime (japanese animation), it should be in a different group. We have to delete it or classify highest-grossing animated films in 2 different sections (by technique and by country) but the latter option will make the page much larger.
  • Maybe we should put 2D computer animation and 3D computer animation in the same sub-section but in different lists.

Paleocemoski 01:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

I may agree with the 2D computer sub-section, they are almost the same thing as they are using softwares as opposed to traditional hand-drawing and stop motion techniques, but with the anime sub-section I've always been unsure, but making a Highest-grossing animation films by country section might not be a good idea. For one thing it will bring a lot of unsurety because some countries may not have good sources or at all to create a Top 10, 20 or 50 animated films, but also this can be material for a separate page, as this is List of highest-grossing animated films, we have a top 50 of all time, we have Tops for each technics, a highest-grossing by year and highest-grossing franchise, I don't think making a highest-grossing by country section is fit for this page, just like making a highest-grossing action/comedy/horror films section is not fit for the List of highest-grossing films page. If anything we should delete the anime sub-section. DCF94 (talk) 13:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
I agree, we should delete the anime sub-section. By the way, we need a complete list of animation techniques and sub-techniques before we put 2D and 3D computer animation in the same sub-section.Paleocemoski 13:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
2D and 3D we put them both under the Computer animation sub-section, they are nearly the same thing, a Traditional animation sub-section and Stop motion animation sub-section should be enough. DCF94 (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Is there any other animation technique we do not have? Are we get ride of anine & 2D compter animtion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 22:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


Franchise and series sources

In the References under the Franchise and series sources some of the grosses are source (toy story, kung fu panda, etc) but some (Pokemon,coludy with a chacge of meatballs, etc) do not why? And could/should we ref those other franchies? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 12:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


peak of Traditional animation

Highest-grossing traditionally animated films
peak rank Title Worldwide gross Year Ref
1 1 The Lion King $987,483,777 1994 [# 3][# 4]
2 2 The Simpsons Movie $527,021,022 2007 [# 5][# 6]
3 1 Aladdin $504,050,219 1992 [# 7][# 4]
3 4 Tarzan $448,191,819 1999 [# 8][# 4]
2 5 Beauty and the Beast $424,967,620 1991 [# 9][# 4]
1 6 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs $418,200,000 1937 [# 10][# 11]
TBA 7 Pocahontas $346,079,773 1995 [# 12]
TBA 8 The Hunchback of Notre Dame $325,338,851 1996 [# 13]
9 9 The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water $323,436,538 2015 [# 14]
TBA 10 Mulan $304,320,254 1998 [# 15]
TBA 11 Spirited Away $289,096,678 2001 [# 16]
TBA 12 Lilo & Stitch $273,144,151 2002 [# 17]
TBA 13 Bambi $267,447,150 1942 [# 18]
TBA 14 The Princess and the Frog $267,045,765 2009 [# 19]
TBA 15 Cinderella $263,591,415 1950 [# 20]
TBA 16 Hercules $252,712,101 1997 [# 21]
TBA 17 Brother Bear $250,397,798 2003 [# 22]
TBA 18 Howl's Moving Castle $235,184,110 2004 [# 23]
TBA 19 The Prince of Egypt $218,613,188 1998 [# 24]
TBA 20 One Hundred and One Dalmatians $215,880,014 1961 [# 25]
TBA 21 The Little Mermaid $211,343,479 1989 [# 26]
TBA 22 The Jungle Book $205,843,612 1967 [# 27]
TBA 23 Ponyo $201,750,937 2008 [# 28]
TBA 24 Atlantis: The Lost Empire $186,053,725 2001 [# 29]
TBA 25 The Emperor's New Groove $169,327,687 2000 [# 30]
TBA 26 Pokémon: The First Movie $163,644,662 1998 [# 31]
TBA 27 Princess Mononoke $159,375,308 1997 [# 32]
TBA 28 An American Tail $150,000,000 1986 [# 33]
TBA 29 The Secret World of Arrietty $145,570,827 2010 [# 34]
TBA 30 Peter Pan $145,000,000 1953 [# 35]
TBA 31 The Rugrats Movie $140,894,675 1998 [# 36]
TBA 32 The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie $140,161,792 2004 [# 37]
TBA 33 Anastasia $139,804,348 1997 [# 38]
TBA 34 The Wind Rises $136,454,220 2013 [# 39]
TBA 35 The Jungle Book 2 $135,703,599 2003 [# 40]
TBA 36 Pokémon: The Movie 2000 $133,949,270 1999 [# 41]
TBA 37 Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron $122,563,539 2002 [# 42]
TBA 38 Return to Never Land $109,862,682 2002 [# 43]
TBA 39 Treasure Planet $109,578,115 2002 [# 44]
TBA 40 Home on the Range $103,951,461 2004 [# 45]
TBA 41 Rugrats in Paris: The Movie $103,291,131 2000 [# 46]
TBA 42 The Tigger Movie $96,159,800 2000 [# 47]
TBA 43 Lady and the Tramp $93,602,326 1955 [# 48]
TBA 44 Fantasia 2000 $90,874,570 1999 [# 49]
TBA 45 Fritz the Cat $90,000,000 1972 [# 50]
TBA 46 Pinocchio $87,000,862 1940 [# 51]
TBA 47 The Land Before Time $84,460,846 1988 [# 52]
TBA 48 Fantasia $83,320,000 1940 [# 53]
TBA 49 Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas $80,767,884 2003 [# 54]
TBA 50 The Road to El Dorado $76,432,727 2003 [# 55]

I trying to find peak of Traditional animation if anyone cars to find some thanks

It is very difficult because some of the older Disney films had many re-releases and we don't know the exact figures for every re-releases so we can't determine the exact position at that time. DCF94 (talk) 17:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

could we give it a try? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 17:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

We need to find a source for every worldwide re-release of SW, Bambi, Cinderella, etc. and I don't think we will be able to, you can try, but it will be a headache. DCF94 (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


Cite error: There are <ref group=#> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=#}} template (see the help page).