Talk:List of gender equality lawsuits

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Entries removed

This section is for listing entries which been removed.

EEOC (Janice Smith) v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. -- United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky

-- Wavelength (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Huang v. Twitter

Ottawahitech (talk) 00:54, 25 January 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

removal in accord with WP:WTAF

In regards to the statement If you make an article "Huang v. Twitter", then the new entry at List of gender equality lawsuits will not be liable to removal in accord with WP:WTAF : It is my undertanding that this only applies to red-linked entries, not plain+ref ones? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 14:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

Court settlements

Many gender related lawsuits are settled out of court with clauses prohibitng dissemination of details. Just wondering if there is interest in keeping track of those lawsuits somehow? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

Not gender; Sex

Sex is characteristic; gender is attributive.

These are sex terms: male, female, androgyne (psychological),intersex (physical), null characteristic

These are gender terms: masculine, feminine, androgynous, no gender (aka non-binary, etc.), etc

Gender does not necessarily correlate to sex, viz. there are men who are very feminine and women who are very masculine; but most people display both masculine and feminine behaviours.

In particular, in the USA, the word gender does not appear in the U.S. Constitution - but the word sex does. U.S. Const., Amend. XIX: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." Your right to vote cannot be abridged or denied based on the characteristics that make one male, female, intersex, etc. Whether one's behaviours are classed as masculine, feminine, androgynous, is not the least bit relevant.

The title of this article should be List of sex equality lawsuits. The suits are not based upon equality of people as masculine and feminine but on equality of people as male and female.

2601:645:C300:5120:8537:2D01:3AED:6B89 (talk) 12:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]