Jump to content

Talk:List of equipment of the Azerbaijani Land Forces

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inaccurate Numbers

[edit]

Numbers of Armored Vehicles and Artillery are inaccurate and very overblown, ill try to fix that and use best source possible to provide accurate numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZUKAGRAD (talk • contribs) 15:00, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijan bought 100 tanks t 90 with an option for another 100. Azerbaijan was left with 325 tanks t 72 from the USSR and after the collapse bought 261 tons 72,53 lost 79 captured. Read the info about our border troops they use 200+ infantry fighting vehicles 2. Azerbaijan bought from Russia 180 armored personnel carriers 80 and 230 armored personnel carriers 82A. Azerbaijan bought 132 armored personnel carriers 70,60 from Belarus from Ukraine and the rest were inherited from the USSR Smorkach 24 (talk) 11:43, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 January 2018

[edit]
91.242.0.89 (talk) 11:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2255

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 17:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 February 2018

[edit]

hi i am from Azerbaijan and i want to edit the updates Aslan the Lionheart (talk) 19:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 20:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Title change

[edit]

How about somebody changes it to something normal, like we have here for military in the rest of the world. We got a ton of 'Equipment of <X forces>' titles here.

Nobody cares about 'modern' or 'old' stuff, and for sure not in the title. As for the lists, bring in what is there, and in use. The T-55 e.g. should be added to a separate section below, 'former equipment', when the last ones are used up for target practise. Same goes for stuff not moth balled, and definitely outdated. Only list what is in service right now, and finito...

Whoever is to blame - I cannot even take over the title for IW linking to another article, because you were so smart to create an extra long title, which screws things. Seems to prevent previewing wiki links, even with correct title. Jazz hands.

So stop fooling around, get that title changed, fix the lists, and add some descriptions before each of the lists, so it doesn't look so bleak. As it is - only listings - it's quite desparate, to say the least.

Thank you in advance. -- 185.16.53.125 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Losses during recent violence.

[edit]

Do you guys think I should add the reported losses in the recent violence or say "some reported lost to combat" or something along those line similar to the Equipment of the Syrian Army list.- User:Garmin21 29 September

Avoid using blog sources

[edit]

Cyrano7th, I'm going to have to make a mass revert here. This is not a reliable source per WP:RS. This is why it has been omitted in 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Avoid using blogs as source. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 14:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m fine with removing the references myself in the notes if that’s a huge problem, I didn’t touch the numbers column. But why via revert? You took a lot of other changes with it. Cyrano7th (talk) 18:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources

[edit]

@Rodriguez.AlvaresMex: you are adding information from unreliable sources which is probably false. Please read WP:RS and stop doing that.--NMW03 (talk) 10:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources/edit warring

[edit]

@Rodriguez.AlvaresMex: You are reverting my changes for no reason and not explaining why you are doing it. Everything I changed has a reason and it was in the description of the edit. Please stop reverting or explain why you are reverting.(talk) 15:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

@Samogits:, please provide reliable sources for this edits.--NMW03 (talk) 11:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KhndzorUtogh: please provide reliable sources or I have to revert your edits. Tweets of random guy is not reliable source.--NMW03 (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NMW03: What do you mean by "tweets of random guy is not reliable source". Robert Lee is one of the most neutral people in the conflict and is well known, he is no "random guy", the links I shared clearly showed what I wrote (by this I mean if I wrote a BMP-2 was destroyed I linked to videos/photos that clearly showed what was meant to be shown). Do you expect me to link to websites (whether it is Armenian or Azerbaijani) regarding this? If so, I could've done that but I chose a neutral source in case others called it biased/unreliable. P.S on the Armenian version of this article people have shared his tweets of photos/videos showing Armenian weaponry being captured/destroyed and I haven't removed/considered removing that.
@Samogits: this is not a reliable source.--NMW03 (talk) 10:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@KhndzorUtogh: tweet is not reliable source according to WP:RSSELF. Because these "sources" cannot be verified. Anyone can argue the contrary and claim that "I am expert in this topic".--NMW03 (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NMW03: Would you prefer if I replaced the tweets with articles then? KhndzorUtogh (talk) 13:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "articles"?--NMW03 (talk) 15:56, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Something like this. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 16:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@KhndzorUtogh: no. This is armenian source. You should provide 3rd party sources.--NMW03 (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NMW03: What sources are you suggesting then? I provided a 3rd party source that is completely neutral and is well known on twitter, yet you still rejected it because "random guy is not reliable source".
It is not 3rd party source nor reliable as I told above.--NMW03 (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In several other wikipedia pages about a country/group's list of equipment, including the Armenian page, they use twitter as a source, (and some even the same account) so I am simply following a precedent. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 14:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't mean you can use it as source. Read WP:TWEET NMW03 (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In this case what example do you classify as a reliable source? Few websites that aren't Armenian or Azerbaijani have listed destroyed equipment/weapons of either side. You reject Armenian websites because they are biased and you reject 3rd party sources because they are on twitter? KhndzorUtogh (talk) 21:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again, tweet is not reliable source. NMW03 (talk) 02:37, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that doesn't answer the question..

Not Really.Propaganda Armenian army!

[edit]

The lies on this page are more than the truth. The creators of this page support the Armenian army. It does not reflect the truth about the Azerbaijani army. Therefore, this page should be closed. Azərbaycan023 (talk) 04:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Really sources.

[edit]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-72_operators_and_variants

The number of T-72 tanks in the Azerbaijani army is not 260, but more than 572. The reason is that in the 2020 Karabakh war, the Armenian army 79 T-72 tanks belonging to the Azerbaijani army were captured. Azərbaycan023 (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_equipment_of_the_Azerbaijani_Land_Forces&oldid=1200195730"