Talk:List of compounds with carbon numbers 50+

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title and name

Title is "List of compounds with carbon numbers 50+", while there's a table containing compoounds with more than 100 carbons. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 06:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alfa-ketosav Had not even noticed this until now. See below. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 January 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that List of compounds with carbon numbers 50–100 be renamed and moved to List of compounds with carbon numbers 50+.

result:
Moved per consensus garnered below. Thanks and kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Editing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 11:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

List of compounds with carbon numbers 50–100 → List of compounds with carbon numbers 50+ – Contains a section for carbon numbers >100. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now. It is a bigger problem that the >100 carbon atoms section is heavily populated with proteins, polypeptides are arbitrary and endlessly variable amino acid sequence. It is more important to remove the natural proteins. I note that sequence variability in the proteins is ignored. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support iff the proteins and polypeptides will not be removed, else neutral. Proteins and polypeptides are technically compounds as well. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 09:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm not expert enough at chemistry to grasp the significance of SmokeyJoe's point above, but as long as the >100 entries are present (and compounds like ziconotide, ramoplanin, enfuvirtide etc. do seem to within scope) then it makes sense for the title to accurately represent the contents. 11:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amakuru (talk • contribs)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.