Talk:List of Star Wars species (A–E)

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Star Wars Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Same Name Redirect

Does anyone else seem to notice that "List of Star Wars species (A-E)" Redirects back to "List of Star Wars species (A-E)"? Is there any logical reason for this? Jdaniels15 (talk) 13:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jdaniels15, the reason for this is that the redirect has a dash between "A" and "E" while this article has an en dash in the title. In the past I have seen edit wars and WP:MOS discussions about if people should use dash, en-dash, em-dash, etc. in various situations and suspect the redirects were one of the consequences coming out of the discussions and/or disagreements.

Here you can see what the dashes look like:

* List of Star Wars species (A–E) - This article with the en-dash in the title.

* List of Star Wars species (A-E) - With a dash in the title. Clicking this will redirect to the A-en-dash-E article.

* List of Star Wars races (A–E) - With an en-dash in the title. Clicking this will redirect to the A-en-dash-E article.

* List of Star Wars races (A-E) - With a dash in the title. Clicking this will redirect to the A-en-dash-E article.

At the bottom of the edit box for Wikipedia articles and talk pages you should see "Insert" followed by an en–dash, em—dash, degree sign, single right curly quote, double right curly quote, etc. Press the minus/dash/hyphen key to get a normal dash. --Marc Kupper|talk 22:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed?

Ehr, you guys do know that Star Wars is a *fictional* universe and these are *fictional* species and all the info is taken from movies, books, comics or games, do you? How on earth is a person supposed to provide source for such information online? Admvenom

Simple: you cite the movies, books, comics or games that the information came from. It doesn't have to be an online source, in fact most of the stuff already in the References section is for books. The purpose of citations is so that editors who are unfamiliar with the information in the article can go to a source and verify that the information is correct. For example, I have never heard of the "Anx" before. How can I go about confirming that there is such a race in the Star Wars canon, and it's not something that some editor just made up on the spot? See Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information on this sort of thing. Bryan 17:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

Bando Gora and B'omarr monks are also found in the List of minor Star Wars organizations. We probably don't need a double of those, and if "the B'omarr are not actually a race," shouldn't we just leave it to the article in organizations? —Skope (talk) 17:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

improvement

Seeing as Wookiepedia has all of these species much more in detail, would it be wrong to copy them from wookiepedia? ILovePlankton⁽^L^—ⁿ⁾ 23:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Modal Nodes.jpg

The image Image:Modal Nodes.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Calamari?

What about the Calamari? Do they go by some other name? LogicalOctopus (talk) 04:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that they call themselves the Mon Calamari. 01:25 PM, 16 Monday 2010 (UTC-5)

Change in entry needed (bad/old info)

'Assemblers' should (more than likely, given the major similarities) be changed to Colicoids. Source: Ultimate Alien Anthologies. Share the same appearance, same behaviour, intellect, etc., etc. Even the name given in the article for it here is a slight dirivation of the example names of the species. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.193.203.107 (talk) 10:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strike that. (more/better info: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Assembler ) But an entry for Colicoids should be made, none the less.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.193.203.107 (talk) 10:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carondians?

After a search of Wookieepedia, and The Essential Atlas, I have not found anything about "Carondians" or "Caronda". It needs to be cited. Darthkayak (talk) 03:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

The introduction seems a little bit confusing, because it does not mention the prequels (Episodes I, II, and III). Is there a reason for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.46.148.99 (talk) 04:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Star Wars species (A–E). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citations and Revisions Needed

For a school assignment, I evaluated the article and found that certain sections are lacking in citations and are in need of more information. I have added more information on the Balosar section and added citations to the section. I have also added more citations where needed to the section on Besaliks.User:Snappedrain23 (talk) 16:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Snappedrain23, I appreciate your article improvement (haven't looked at that yet), but for the review you will need to do more--as we discussed in class. And a list article on a fictional world is probably not the best thing to review: I suggest you find an article with a lot of text on some real topic. Good luck, Dr Aaij (talk) 00:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]