Talk:List of LittleBigPlanet 2 downloadable content packs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Premium/free/other

Should we add another column, Availability or something, showing whether the pack is "Free" or "Paid"? Is this WP:N? Chimpanzee⁺ ^{Us | Ta | Co} 14:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We could mention the free ones in the notes section, and by default that would point out the paid for ones. Whilst not Sailing towards WP:NOPRICES, its drifting in that direction. - X201 (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of that we could just have a "Free" yes/no column. I'm just thinking that it might be more useful to readers to be able to separate the free ones from the non-free ones. That's if we should even have the information at all? It was just an idea really but I'm not sure how useful it would be. What do you think?Chimpanzee⁺ ^{Us | Ta | Co} 15:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Toy Story DLC

The Toy Story Alien costume will probably appear in one of the Toy Story packs. I think the best way of handling it would be to leave the date field for the Alien empty and add a note to the end say "Alien costume was also released in Toy Story Pack x". The same will probably be true of Gonzo as well, I doubt that they'd make just a single Muppet DLC. Any thoughts?- X201 (talk) 08:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portal 2

Can you make Portal 2 Costume and Level Kit — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDarkPyrano (talk • contribs) 20:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got a link that says that Media Molecule are going to make Portal 2 costumes/Level kit? We can't add anything to the article unless it can be backed up with a link to a news story on a reliable website. - X201 (talk) 20:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes i do go to: http://lbp.me/v/xzdpms add the queue and play. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.233.150.194 (talk) 19:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a major overhaul

With the recent announcement of LittleBigPlanet 3 and the confirmation of backward-compatibility with existing DLC, this and the other article are really in need of an overhaul so we can accurately show cross-compatibility. The best way to do this that I can think of is to create two new pages to replace these:

List of LittleBigPlanet costume packs

A table listing costume name, first release date, notes, LBP, LBP 2, LBP 3, LBP V, LBP K - the last 5 being yes/no columns.

List of LittleBigPlanet content packs

A table for each game (similar to the existing tables) showing pack name, first release date, #levels, #costumes, #stickers, other content. These tables wouldn't include packs that only contain costumes.

There would need to be some overlap in these articles where packs contain costumes and other content. Thoughts? Chimpanzee ^{Us | Ta | Co} 12:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How about this?...

Pack name and citation	First released	Notes	Compatibility
Pack name and citation	First released	Notes	1	2	3	V	K
DC Comics Costume Pack 1 →	17 Dec 2013	Pack contains: Superman, Supergirl, Lex Luthor, Brainiac and Bizarro.	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes
DC Comics Costume Pack 2 →	8 Jan 2014	Pack contains: Batman Joker, Harley Quinn, Poison Ivy and Batgirl.	Yes	No	Yes	No	No

I'm still pondering how to handle the cross-over stuff. - X201 (talk) 15:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, something like that. Is there a better way to handle the compatibility column headings. I think they're too abbreviated at the moment (especially V and K). How about

Pack name and citation	First released	Notes	Compatibility
Pack name and citation	First released	Notes	LBP 1	LBP 2	LBP 3	Vita	Karting
DC Comics Costume Pack 1 →	17 Dec 2013	Pack contains: Superman, Supergirl, Lex Luthor, Brainiac and Bizarro.	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes
DC Comics Costume Pack 2 →	8 Jan 2014	Pack contains: Batman Joker, Harley Quinn, Poison Ivy and Batgirl.	Yes	No	Yes	No	No

I don't think there's any way around listing costumes on both pages in cases like the Weekend Pursuits Costume Pack. I don't think this is a major problem given that each article serves its own purpose. Chimpanzee ^{Us | Ta | Co} 11:58, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We could go with "What is the main thing/reason for the pack?" and put the rest in the notes e.g The Muppets Premium Level Kit exists to package the creation materials but you also get a Rowlf costume with it. The costume isn't the main point of the pack, but it is part of it. - X201 (talk) 08:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So the Muppets pack wouldn't appear on the Costumes page? My thinking was that the Costumes list includes all DLC costumes regardless of what sort of pack they come in. The other list would show all DLC packs excepts the ones that only include costumes. Chimpanzee ^Talk 09:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of LittleBigPlanet 2 downloadable content packs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]