Talk:List of Davis Cup champions
![]() | List of Davis Cup champions is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on November 30, 2018. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of final appearances
[edit]The column "Now known as"... What is it for? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.139.23.6 (talk) 17:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Davis Cup champions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160711001803/http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/tennis-popular-and-international to http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/tennis-popular-and-international
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 28 November 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
List of Davis Cup champions → List of Davis Cup finals and finalists – The main table provides all the key details about the final of each edition, with not particularly more emphasis given to the winner than to other data. The minor tables (performance by nation/continent) include nations and continents that have not won, so if the focus of the article were on winners (the tournament does not style itself a championship, so I would prefer to avoid the word champion) the likes of Belgium, Slovakia and Asia should be absent. Kevin McE (talk) 20:04, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Support List of Davis Cup finals as a more concise option to the one proposed above. Iffy★Chat -- 13:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - This is pretty standard for these types of articles to include the vanquished as well as the champion. See articles such as List of Wimbledon gentlemen's singles champions, List of Super Bowl champions, List of NBA champions, List of Stanley Cup champions, List of World Series champions, List of Scottish football champions, List of world snooker champions. So I'm not sure what's really different about this article when compared to all the others. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - per the reason outlined by Fyunck. It's common practice to include the losing party in these type of lists. Don't see any need for the page to be moved. NapHit (talk) 23:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.