Talk:Lipstick feminism

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

the proponents and opponents sections need citations

Agreed. Eperotao (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Useful to know in what sense this is feminism?

Without citations and further explanation of how this fits into feminism, I would move to delete. So far, "lipstick feminism" appears to be a phrase more suitable for a dictionary than an encyclopedia entry. Eperotao (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could this be a subpage for sex-positive feminism? (B2018 (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Lipstick feminism vs. sex-positive feminism

Lipstick feminism seems to share certain characteristics with sex-positive feminism. I think this article should explain what the differences are something something I'm not yet clear on. --Cab88 (talk) 08:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lipstick feminism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311045759/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_1998_Nov/ai_53215091 to http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_1998_Nov/ai_53215091

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the info in this article is getting sex-positive feminism confused with lipstick feminism. While these two topics are similar and related, they are different in scope and theory. The pictures included in the article are also unrelated and vague. They do not demonstrate the core thoughts of this idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mah599 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 21 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LyricRhodes20 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ashley.restel.

— Assignment last updated by Mlclark1 (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-02

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chumbina (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Cerade.

— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Melanieeeedawson (article contribs). Peer reviewers: TherealHarv, Wolfpack3810.

— Assignment last updated by CarsonJones06 (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2023 and 8 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Destiinyespinoza (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Yuliana Acevedo.

— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 20:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies-17

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 February 2023 and 19 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sqygkiwi (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Obliviousmag (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bust Magazine Subsection

There is already a wikipedia page for Bust (magazine). How should we best incorporate that into the "in Media" section of the article? Would it be best linked under the See Also section or should the already existing page be linked with a short introductory paragraph?

If there is a good list of more publications, it could be included that way in place of the subsection it is in right now.Jiltedsquirrel (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suffragist vs. Suffragette

Suffragist was the word used to describe women fighting for the right to vote, in the U.S. In Britain, where the word suffragette was reclaimed from a reported to empower themselves. The suffragists in the U.S. thought that the "ette" ending was used to diminish their work and the importance of women voting. So, the folks who opposed women's right to vote often called them "suffragettes." Just another example of power embedded in words and what they mean, who uses them, how they are used as weapons and for empowerment. Here is a quote from the National Parks as a source:

"The battle for woman’s suffrage was in full force in both Britain and the United States in the early 1900s. Reporters took sides, and in 1906, a British reporter used the word “suffragette” to mock those fighting for women’s right to vote. The suffix “-ette” is used to refer to something small or diminutive, and the reporter used it to minimize the work of British suffragists." https://www.nps.gov/articles/suffragistvssuffragette.htm

Here is a source in South Australia that will tell you the words marked different generations of the movement: https://officeforwomen.sa.gov.au/womens-policy/125th-anniversary-of-suffrage/suffragistsuffragette-whats-the-difference#:~:text=Suffragists%20believed%20in%20peaceful%2C%20constitutional,militant%20action%20for%20the%20cause. Handsome-panther (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]