Talk:Limia/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Surtsicna (talk · contribs) 10:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Matthew Yeager (talk · contribs) 18:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Great nomination. I'm looking for your response and/or edits on point 2.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Great article! Looking forward to when red links resolve and allow for the Species section to flow in prose instead of relying on a list. No change requested today on this topic.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Spot check references to verify citations. Reviewed CopyVios tool against sources.

• Reference 7: File extension typo "repository.naturalis.nl/pub/504959/BEAU2002052006001.pdff"

Fixed. Surtsicna (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Reference 13: Are you able to cite page(s) or inline page ref with {{rp|p=124}}?

Done. Surtsicna (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Broad coverage in habitat, discovery, and characteristics while staying centered on overall genus.

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are own-work of several users. Captions provide context.

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.