Jump to content

Talk:Limia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Limia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Surtsicna (talk · contribs) 10:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Matthew Yeager (talk · contribs) 18:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Great nomination. I'm looking for your response and/or edits on point 2.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Great article! Looking forward to when red links resolve and allow for the Species section to flow in prose instead of relying on a list. No change requested today on this topic.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Spot check references to verify citations. Reviewed CopyVios tool against sources.
  • Reference 7: File extension typo "repository.naturalis.nl/pub/504959/BEAU2002052006001.pdff"
Fixed. Surtsicna (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reference 13: Are you able to cite page(s) or inline page ref with {{rp|p=124}}?
Done. Surtsicna (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Broad coverage in habitat, discovery, and characteristics while staying centered on overall genus.
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images are own-work of several users. Captions provide context.
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]

Limia tridens male
Limia tridens male
  • ... that limias (L. tridens pictured) and other freshwater fish and land vertebrates are controversially hypothesized to have colonized the Caribbean islands via a mysterious land bridge?
Improved to Good Article status by Surtsicna (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 187 past nominations.

Surtsicna (talk) 22:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]