Talk:Lilian Faithfull

Lilian Faithfull has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 12, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 1, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Lilian Faithfull, the first women's hockey captain at Oxford University, was the first to suggest the Lady Blue for women competing in a game between Oxford and Cambridge?

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 12, 2019.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Feminism Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Social Work Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lilian Faithfull/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pleasant1623 (talk · contribs) 15:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will post comments on the next day. Regards, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 15:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead: Looks pretty good overall.

Early life and education: No issues.

Career

"marked the start of the so-called Lady Blue". You can change it to just "marked the start of the Lady Blue".
"In 1907, Faithfull became principal of Cheltenham Ladies' College succeeding Dorothea Beale." --> "In 1907, Faithfull became the principal of Cheltenham Ladies' College, succeeding Dorothea Beale."
The honorary MA and the Commander of the British Empire part should come after the the principal of Cheltenham Ladies' College and the Justice of the Peace part.
Why there is no mention how she died?

Doesn't say in the ODNB.

"She was buried in Cheltenham" --> "After her death, she was buried in Cheltenham"
The last sentence which mentions that Faithfull never married looks a bit awkward, mostly because it is mentioned after the sentences mentioning her death. It'll be better if you move it to somewhere more suitable (like after the The Constant Nymph sentence).

Sources

What makes www.lilianfaithfull.co.uk a reliable source?

It's the website for her housing, so I think its appropriate to source the housing to the official website.

The other sources are good.

I will pass the article after the comments have been addressed. Regards, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 07:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All points addressed, thanks.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final analysis

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I'll be really glad to see the article expanded a little bit more. Good job, overall. Thanks, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 11:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this is just about all that seems to exist for her, I've tried to find more details to expand it but can't find anything substantial.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]