Talk:Lichun

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 4, 2007, February 4, 2008, and February 4, 2024.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Needs a Chinese to English translation. Happy new year! Andycjp 04:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The second row in the table with the dates next to the right margin states "330° Yushui Feb.4-19" whereas it should state "330° Feb.18-19"; the date 4 just after Feb. should change to 18 User:burst3 —Preceding comment was added at 18:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same happens with the "180° Qiufen" row in in this table; it states "180° Qiufen Sep.7-24" whereas it should state "180° Qiufen Sep.23-24"; the date 7 immediately after Sep. should change to 23. User:burst3

Why are they pentads if there's only three of them? Shouldn't they be triads? 140.32.143.10 (talk) 19:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Japanese Wiktionary ja:wikt:初候, they are five days long. --BB12 (talk) 06:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No spring year?

What does it mean that there are years without a lichun? "A year without Lichun is called 無春年 (no spring year). 無春年 is also known as 寡婦年 (widow year) in northern China or 盲年 (blind year) in southern China." When does this occur? --BB12 (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When the Chinese New Year (which is determined by lunar phases, and may happen on a day between January 22 and February 22) occurs late, after the Lichun, and the year, determined according to the Chinese Lunar Calendar is not a leap year, containing only 12 short (354 or 355 days), and not 13 months (383, 384 or 385 days), so that that the nest Chinese New Year happens before the next Lichun. In a contrary situation there might be years that contain two Lichuns. noychoH (talk) 21:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lichun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061213170308/http://www.gio.gov.tw/info/festival_c/farmer_e/farmer_e.htm to http://www.gio.gov.tw/info/festival_c/farmer_e/farmer_e.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]