Talk:Licensed production
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Licenced production → Licensed production – Correct a misspelling after a recent undiscussed move. The article, per WP:ENGVAR, was already using British spellings, with the 's' spelling of 'license' when used as a verb Andy Dingley (talk) 23:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Many people seem unaware that while the noun in British English is "licence", the verb is "license". Not sure if this is the reverse of US English or not, as I've certainly seen Americans use "licence" as a verb and I know they use "license" as a noun. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:06, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- No objection to rename (editor who recently moved article). DexDor (talk) 19:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class Economics articles
- Unknown-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Start-Class Trade articles
- Unknown-importance Trade articles
- WikiProject Trade articles
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles