Talk:Liberty High School (Washington)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liberty High School (Washington) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reasoning for assessment: Minimal references and they need to be made inline (see WP:CITE). Needs expansion. Adam McCormick (talk) 01:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit comments

I just finished a copy edit, and wanted to mention a couple of things. This article appears to have been put together by some folks who really care about this school and that it and its achievements are noted. You've done a really good job. Most of the edits that build this article are from non-registered IP contributors, and given the quality of work that you've done, I'd really like to encourage you to register and continue here as Wikipedians...there are plenty of subjects that could use your talents here. One suggestion about the article: you might want to consider citing your references a little more thoroughly, using footnotes (WP:CITE has info on how to do this, and I'm happy to answer questions on it as well). If you're a student, I'm sure you've learned how to do this through your research papers...see, that stuff really does get used in the real world! Happy editing! Akradecki 00:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a lot of this article is written like a yearbook and has information that is unencyclopedic or is just written in list form. There is close to zero citations on this page as well. I will remove some of it but leave a lot with citation notices so that people who know these facts are free to help improve the page constructively. --DerRichter (talk) 12:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also there should probably be some reasoning why such clubs as "Thrift Store Club" are notable enough for wikipedia. Has this club accomplished something notable maybe? Also, every school has an alma mater and fight song, but it is hardly encyclopedic. This may be helpful:http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools#Structure-- --DerRichter (talk) 12:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kjsandkjsa.jpg

Image:Kjsandkjsa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Wikipedia is a great place to use sources. If there is no source, I have no idea if it is true or not. See additionally: If it is true, it should be easy to supply a reference. If it is not true, it should be removed. Therefore statements which have no source will be removed after a long time of being labeled as not having one. I have left most of the information in the hopes that people will be responsible enough to cite where they recieved it from. Please discuss this here before removing the requests for citations. --DerRichter (talk) 07:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content

I have removed many unsourced claims which have been on this page since April of 2008. If anything is to be added, please use sources. Thanks. --DerRichter (talk) 07:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]