Jump to content

Talk:Lethbridge Collegiate Institute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleLethbridge Collegiate Institute was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
March 18, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 29, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
September 5, 2007Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
February 1, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 15, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Quality?

[edit]

Does someone from the "all schools should have articles" crowd care to keep an eye on this? Friday (talk) 16:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

[edit]

The thing this article needs most is more references. Four is not enough for an article this size. --Kmsiever 13:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finding references for this article is hard, especially without seeking documents produced by the school itself. PhoenixTwo 18:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't doubt it. But having only four references for an article this size makes it appear like it is mostly original research at best and unverifiable claims at worst. As I said, that alone will likely be the most important thing to improve this article. Take a look at the Plano high school you used as an example. --Kmsiever 18:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for having a look at it. PhoenixTwo 20:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, you may find WP:CITET useful. --Kmsiever 03:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA hold

[edit]

Not bad, but there are several paragraphs with no ref at all. Rlevse 18:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:WIAGA: Unambiguous citations of reliable sources are necessary for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. Indicating to me that it is acceptable to have unreferenced areas, as long as they do not contain statements which are likely to be challenged. If there are any individual statements for which you would like a citation let me know; having said that, acquiring references not produced by the school itself has been difficult. PhoenixTwo 19:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WIAGA also says an article that is factually accurate and verifiable "contains no elements of original research." Without any references, it is difficult to establish whether a statement is original research or not. If you live in Lethbridge, have you tried the the local library to check past issue of the Lethbridge Herald for example? Not all sources need be online. --Kmsiever 21:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is indeed not feasible for me to obtain any kind of physical source, at least any time soon. I was trying to get at the fact that there are hundreds of current good articles that lack inline citations in their entirety, so I'm not sure why this article is held to what appears to be a higher standard. Several more statements are attributable to existing sources, but I don't see them as statements that need to be cited. PhoenixTwo 22:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Standards evolve over time and many articles are losing GA status for lack of refs. See WP:GA/R.Rlevse 09:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

With the page ready for a final proofread, my only concern is that some sources need to be verified.--Kenneth M Burke 23:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Lethbridge Collegiate Institute/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]

To uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of February 28, 2010, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Reasonably well written
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    A number of dead links were found and tagged using this tool.
    Live links and off line sources appear to be RS
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just some dead links to be sorted out. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    No effots has been made to fix the dead links, so I am delisting this now. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Lethbridge Collegiate Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 10 external links on Lethbridge Collegiate Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Lethbridge Collegiate Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Lethbridge Collegiate Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Lethbridge Collegiate Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lethbridge Collegiate Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lethbridge_Collegiate_Institute&oldid=1208153289"