Talk:Laws of robotics
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Tilden's Laws of Robotics page were merged into Laws of robotics on 19 December 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Google's amendments
[edit]Google recently is reported to make its "5 amendments" to the laws: http://www.cnet.com/news/google-goes-asimov-and-spells-out-concrete-ai-safety-concerns/ I think this should be included here, or elsewhere? Or is it already included somewhere? I am not qualified enough at the time with the topic, but I may try to add this later. --ssr (talk) 19:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Satya Nadella's laws- 5 or 6?
[edit]I see "roughly sketched five rules" and then 6 rules are listed. Is it 5 (remove a rule or merge 2 of them) or 6 (change the preface)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manassehkatz (talk • contribs) 15:59, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- He lists six "AI must" points in the Slate article.
- The introduction to that list is
To that end, I have reflected on what are the principles and goals, as an industry and a society, that we should discuss and debate.
, though, I'm not sure how well this fits the article. Belbury (talk) 13:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)