Talk:Lancaster Canal

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Waterways Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment

I'm not sure this rates B-class, there is a lot of uncited material (and this is flagged on the article page) which if inserted would merit B but for the moment I think it's C only. NtheP (talk) 09:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rectified. NtheP (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge images

A Geograph user has pictures of the canal's bridges 14 to 32. Would it be overkill to put them all in a gallery in the article? - Dudesleeper / Talk 16:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it would be, I think. One or two representative pictures of bridges, embedded in the article text, is sufficient for illustrative purposes (see Wikipedia:Images#Image_choice_and_placement. What you could do, however, is upload them to Wikimedia Commons, create a gallery or category there, and link it from the article. The templates {{commons}}, {{commonscat}} or {{commonsimages}} can be used for this purpose. --Blisco (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aqueduct restoration

The article says "…Lune Aqueduct was scheduled for a £2,000,000 facelift in 2009/10 …the work is not now expected to be completed until 2015." and British Waterways says "The Lune Aqueduct, which has recently benefited from a £2.4 million transformation" SandJ-on-WP (talk) 05:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

UK-Motorway-icon.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

UK-Motorway-icon.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]